Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,621 posts)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:17 AM Jan 2013

Billionaires' fortunes hinder fight against poverty, says Oxfam

Billionaires' fortunes hinder fight against poverty, says Oxfam

Charity says $240bn amassed by 100 richest people last year would be enough to end extreme poverty four times over

Phillip Inman, economics correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Saturday 19 January 2013 02.01 EST

The vast fortunes made by the world's richest 100 billionaires is driving up inequality and hindering the world's ability to tackle poverty, according to Oxfam.

The charity said the accumulation of wealth and income on an unprecedented scale, often at the expense of secure jobs and decent wages for the poorest, undermined the ability of people who survive on aid or low wages to improve their situation and escape poverty.

Oxfam said the world's poorest could be lifted out of poverty several times over should the richest 100 billionaires give away the money they made last year.

Without pointing a finger at individuals, the charity argued that the $240bn (£150bn) net income amassed in 2012 by the richest 100 billionaires would be enough to make extreme poverty history four times over.

More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jan/19/super-rich-fight-poverty-oxfam

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Billionaires' fortunes hinder fight against poverty, says Oxfam (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2013 OP
Du rec. nt xchrom Jan 2013 #1
Nobody needs a billion dollars. K&R. ck4829 Jan 2013 #2
Nobody even needs $500 million. nikto Jan 2013 #3
I think I could get by on that for the rest of my life. AnnieK401 Jan 2013 #8
They are most likely correct Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #4
Exactly AnnieK401 Jan 2013 #9
And RepubliCONS want to repeal the estate tax or the Paris Hilton tax fasttense Jan 2013 #5
And that is because the uber-rich OWN American politicians. That is why the laws... Raster Jan 2013 #7
So True fasttense Jan 2013 #13
What is the point to adding billions to multi-billion dollar fortunes? tclambert Jan 2013 #6
Good points AnnieK401 Jan 2013 #10
Why feed poor people when you can buy old master's paintings and keep them locked in a vault... Scuba Jan 2013 #11
Slightly Disagree erpowers Jan 2013 #12
Kick Blue_Tires Jan 2013 #14
No fucking shit. Zoeisright Jan 2013 #15

AnnieK401

(541 posts)
8. I think I could get by on that for the rest of my life.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:08 AM
Jan 2013

even 30. I'm not young anymore, and I could clip coupons.

AnnieK401

(541 posts)
9. Exactly
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:10 AM
Jan 2013

I looked it up, there are approx. 1,200 billionaires in the world. About 400 (or 1/3) live here. Since we make up only 5% of the world's population there must be something they like.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
5. And RepubliCONS want to repeal the estate tax or the Paris Hilton tax
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 07:28 AM
Jan 2013

op that the rich get even richer.

At some point the money you make off your money is so huge, no one need ever be productive. There needs to be a limit on the amount of wealth you can accumulate. I think 10 million should be enough for anyone.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
7. And that is because the uber-rich OWN American politicians. That is why the laws...
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 07:51 AM
Jan 2013

...are written to protect their interests and guard their fortunes.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
6. What is the point to adding billions to multi-billion dollar fortunes?
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 07:47 AM
Jan 2013

A few billionaires, like Elon Musk (founder of PayPal, Tesla Motors and SpaceX), are using their billions to do interesting things and perhaps things beneficial for society in the long term. Many are in it just for the sport of making more money. The money is just for keeping score, not for living on (that requires very little of their incomes), nor for improving the world.

I suppose the Koch Brothers and Sheldon Adelson would insist the hundreds of millions they spent (wasted) on Mitt Romney's campaign were meant to save the world from the evils of Obama-ism, not as an investment for which they would have demanded Romney provide them with massive profits, nor as an indulgence of their own egos. They would be lying to us and possibly to themselves by saying so.

Guys like Donald Trump, though, seem interested only in making the next deal. And the deals have to get bigger and bigger to continue to provide the "rush" they crave.

Is there a 12-step program for money addiction?

AnnieK401

(541 posts)
10. Good points
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:12 AM
Jan 2013

Although I have my doubts about whether or not Trump is actually a billionaire. After all, we haven't seen his balance sheet.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
11. Why feed poor people when you can buy old master's paintings and keep them locked in a vault...
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:49 AM
Jan 2013

... while you display replicas on your walls?

Which one of these acts will bring more self-satisfaction?

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
12. Slightly Disagree
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 03:15 PM
Jan 2013

I may just be splitting hairs and the article seemed to mention this, but it is not the fortunes of billionaires that is preventing an end to poverty it is low wages. If people were paid more there would be less inequality and poverty.

The United States government should end carried interest for hedge fund managers and anyone else who can use the practice. Then lawmakers should seek to increase the wages of at least low income workers.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Billionaires' fortunes hi...