Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

groovedaddy

(6,231 posts)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:42 PM Jan 2013

A Crash Course in Playing the Numbers

The chances are that you turn to this part of the newspaper in search of some reliable tools for optimizing your health. The chances are that you periodically visit a doctor for the same reason.

Alas, what you seek cannot be found in either place, not if it’s certitude you’re after. Whether you are healthy, moribund or traversing the stages of decrepitude in between, every morsel of medical advice you receive is pure conjecture — educated guesswork perhaps, but guesswork nonetheless. Your health care provider and your favorite columnist are both mere croupiers, enablers for your health gambling habit.

Staying well is all about probability and risk. So is the interpretation of medical tests, and so are all treatments for all illnesses, dire and trivial alike. Health has nothing in common with the laws of physics and everything in common with lottery cards, mutual funds and tomorrow’s weather forecast.

Thus, no matter how many vitamin-based, colon-cleansing, fat-busting diet and exercise books show up in 2013, the most important health book of the year is likely to remain Charles Wheelan’s sparkling and intensely readable “Naked Statistics,” even though it’s not primarily about health.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/science/naked-statistics-by-charles-wheelan-review.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130129

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Crash Course in Playing the Numbers (Original Post) groovedaddy Jan 2013 OP
Yes. Organiic systems are much too complicated to be highly predictable. bemildred Jan 2013 #1

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
1. Yes. Organiic systems are much too complicated to be highly predictable.
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 09:28 AM
Jan 2013

In fact, that's the whole point, that possibility of something new.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»A Crash Course in Playing...