Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,161 posts)
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:52 PM Feb 2013

Forget Drones. The Real Problem Is “War Without Boundaries”

Let’s ignore, for a moment, the debate over killing civilians and assassinating American citizens with armed drones.
Let’s hold off on wondering whether these drones create more enemies than they kill.

Instead, let’s focus on the context in which we’re using them, and why it’s problematic.

In the Washington Post last week, Mark Jacobson called armed drones “the weapons of choice for today’s battlefield without boundaries.” For The Daily Telegraph, Con Coughlin wrote in favor of using drones by arguing that “al-Qaeda and its allies are waging a war against the West which knows no boundaries.”
This theme of a global battlefield has become common and accepted. And what Jacobson, Coughlin, and others are saying, of course, is partially true: that terrorists and gangsters are not confined by lines on a map. But somewhere along the way, we redefined the words war and battlefield.


http://nation.time.com/2013/02/13/forget-drones-the-real-problem-is-war-without-boundaries/
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Wars without End. Perpetual War.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:54 PM
Feb 2013

I'm probably at just that age where I can say WTF, what ever happened to the wars that eventually end, like Viet Nam, WW2, and (sort of) Korea?

I think IKE knew what was afoot.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
2. Without geographical or time or financial boundaries
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:06 PM
Feb 2013

And it's self perpetuating too. Attack > blowback > retaliate > blowback > retaliate.........

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. This isn't the 1980s. There are no more walls,borders. It's a good thing we're not isolationists
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:08 PM
Feb 2013

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
4. Drones are high tech snipers, high altitude "hit men". To me, it doesn't seem like a good
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:20 PM
Feb 2013

thing for us.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
5. To combat this we obviously need a perpetual police state around the world.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:43 PM
Feb 2013

It's only logical. And most will go willingly. Guaranteed security. Just be willing to be "chipped" like our pets.

Buddha help us.

Martin Eden

(15,629 posts)
9. Yes, the concept of perpetual "war" without boundaries is the **CENTRAL ISSUE** here
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 08:58 PM
Feb 2013

Regardless of the technology or methods we employ pursuant to that war.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. Agreed. Drones are an instrumentality, not the main problem.
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 12:29 PM
Feb 2013

Congress needs to redefine the 2001 AUMF, and quickly.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Forget Drones. The Real P...