The Shape of Time | John Michael Greer

[Tace]

Amedeo Modigliani (1884–1920), ‘Caryatid’ (1913), Pencil and crayon on paper, 55 x 41.5cm, © The Garman Ryan Collection, The New Art Gallery, Walsall

May 1, 2013 (Archdruid Report) -- Trying to have a conversation about the issues central to this sequence of posts, to make use of an apt if familiar metaphor, is rather like trying to discuss the nature of water with fish. The ideas that play the largest part in shaping our experience of the world and of ourselves are so deeply woven into the act of perception itself that we rarely if ever notice them until we run face first into their limits.

Even suggesting that there are ideas woven into the act of perception, for that matter, gets a blank look much more often than not. Most people, most of the time, think and act as though the things that they experience with their senses and sort with their thoughts are objective realities “out there,” and pay no attention to the generations of careful research that’s shown that what we perceive is a cooperative project in which external stimuli, the biologically defined structures of our sense organs and nervous systems, and the culturally and individually defined contents of our minds all have roles to play.

There’s good reason for that lack of awareness. Patterns of thinking, like patterns of action, are most efficient when they don’t require conscious attention. Just as you can’t really become skilled at playing a musical instrument until you no longer have to consciously move every finger into position on the keys or strings, you can’t really use a way of thinking about the world until it slips below the surface of the mind and starts to structure how you experience other things. Pay attention to the way your mind works when you wake in dim light in an unfamiliar room, and the vague shapes around you take time to turn into recognizable furniture, and you’ll get a sense of the way this affects your awareness of the world; learn some cognitive skill such as plant identification, and notice the shifts in perception as foliage changes from a vague green blur to a galaxy of legible patterns, and you’ll get a sense of the same process from a different angle.

The difficulty with this otherwise helpful process comes when the unnoticed ideas you’re using to frame your experience of the world no longer tell you the things you most need to know. Wilderness tracker Tom Brown Jr. tells a story in one of his books about a group of students who were learning plant identification, and were out with Brown on a herb walk. Brown stopped them at one point along the trail, pointed to a plant, and said, “What do you see?” The students all correctly named the plant. “Get closer and take another look,” Brown said. The students did so, and confirmed that it was, in fact, the plant they’d named. After several repetitions, they were almost on top of the plant, and it wasn’t until then that the rabbit that was nibbling on the plant leaves bounded away, startling the students. They had been paying so much attention to plants that they hadn’t seen the rabbit at all.

more

http://worldnewstrust.com/the-shape-of-time-john-michael-greer

[mgc1961]

1. K & R

[ms liberty]

2. K&R...n/t

[fasttense]

3. Except that we have all the energy we need for free right now.

The sun gives us all the energy we can ever use, and yet we instead dig up crappy oil and gas to burn and destroy our planet in the process. It's not like there is no alternative that is clean, free and limitless. It's just that we refuse to change because a handful of old rich people still want to do it the old and dirty way.

Can you imagine what could be done if BP or Exxon put their profits to work making solar technology available? Right now the big oil corporations are like the telegraph companies of old who never changed over to the telephone. Whole new companies had to be created to introduce the phone because the old corporations did not want to change over from the the telegraph.