Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:41 PM Jun 2013

In Major Blow To Consumers, Supreme Court Protects Mega-Corporations From Liability

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/06/20/2189061/even-small-businesses-cant-shake-mega-corporations-chokehold-on-access-to-the-courts/

In case it wasn’t clear already, the U.S. Supreme Court hammered home Thursday morning that it will protect the rights of corporations to force arbitration over the individuals’ access to the court system at any expense.

In a 5-3 ruling with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused, Justice Antonin Scalia eviscerated almost any opportunity small merchants have to challenge alleged monopolistic practices by American Express in their credit card agreements.

Sound familiar? Earlier this term, the court turned back on procedural grounds a lawsuit alleging monopolistic practices by Comcast. A week after that, they turned back the claims of workers to challenge employer practices as a class. And in 2011, they issued one of the worst blows to consumer rights in years when they held that consumers challenging $30 fees could not sue together as a class. In each of these cases, the court’s procedural rulings mean the parties may never get to argue about whether these corporations actually violated the law. And as a consequence, these corporations may never be held accountable.

With Thursday’s ruling, the court added small businesses to the list of aggrieved parties whose access to the courthouse has been foreclosed by boilerplate contracts that prohibit parties from filing their challenge as a class, or from otherwise alleviating the immense cost of filing their claims individually. This time, the litigants were small businesses taking on American Express, and their lawyer was none other than conservative powerhouse Paul Clement. Clement has argued many of the major conservative court wins of the past few years, and his argument on the side of the plaintiffs was probably the last best shot at curbing the Roberts Court’s total perversion of the Federal Arbitration Act.
(more)
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Major Blow To Consumers, Supreme Court Protects Mega-Corporations From Liability (Original Post) Bill USA Jun 2013 OP
I had hoped by now that people would be boycotting the big corps. as much as possible. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #1
if our corporation owned politicians would do the right things these suits would be unneccesary nt msongs Jun 2013 #2
K&R. nt OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #3

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. I had hoped by now that people would be boycotting the big corps. as much as possible.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:02 PM
Jun 2013

Our wallets are getting thnner, but we still can "vote" with them by being choosy when shopping.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»In Major Blow To Consumer...