Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(80,074 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 11:53 AM Jan 2012

Montana Upholds Ban on Corporate Electioneering, Leads Growing National Revolt


Published on Thursday, January 12, 2012 by [font color="blue"]CommonDreams.org[/font]
Montana Upholds Ban on Corporate Electioneering, Leads Growing National Revolt

by Jeff Milchen


On December 30, the Montana Supreme Court issued a stunning ruling, rejecting arguments that the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Citizens United vs. FEC applied to Montana’s century-old ban on direct corporate election spending. The 5-2 ruling overturned a lower court and reinstated Montana's Corrupt Practices Act, a citizen initiative passed to confront some of the most overt corporate corruption in American history.

While the Montana ruling detailed several ways in which the Corrupt Practices Act differed from the federal statute struck down in Citizens United, the justices clearly rejected much of the U.S. Supreme Court's rationale. Citizens United struck down a federal law that prohibited corporations from directly spending company funds to advocate for or against political candidates.

One key distinction in Montana's case was that the state presented extensive evidence of actual corruption, which the U.S. Supreme Court found lacking in Citizens United. And while Citizens United did not address nonpartisan and judicial elections, Montana's law protects the very justices who decided the case from being intimidated or corrupted.

Of course, money drowning out the voice of citizens can happen in almost any election now, thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court bestowing Bill of Rights protections upon corporations - entities never mentioned in our Constitution. Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Citizens United also asserted that "independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption," a view rejected by the Montana Justices. ..................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/01/12-0



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montana Upholds Ban on Corporate Electioneering, Leads Growing National Revolt (Original Post) marmar Jan 2012 OP
thanks k&r unionworks Jan 2012 #1
I am proud of my state for this montanacowboy Jan 2012 #2
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #3

montanacowboy

(6,733 posts)
2. I am proud of my state for this
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 12:19 PM
Jan 2012

at least we still have some judges with common sense unlike some of the politicians of the repukian persuasian here

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Montana Upholds Ban on Co...