Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dr Fate

(32,189 posts)
Thu Apr 28, 2011, 03:41 PM Apr 2011

I have to wonder what he could have accomplished if DEMS had called the GOP's BLUFFon the filibuster

As opposed to using the filibuster that never was as an excuse for the falied agenda that never was.

Not to mention that the filibuster would not even be an issue, if not for the conservat...errr, I mean "centrist" Democrats who Obama either secretly agreed with, or was unable to lead.

Seems to me that if we are not willling to call the GOP & conseva...err, I mean "centrist" DEM bluffs as to the filibuster, then the filibuster is just another excuse for letting the GOP & conservat...errr, I mean "centrist" DEMS have their way. As usual.

Seems to me that the DEMS used/are using/will continue to use the specter of a GOP filibuster as an excuse, as opposed to the GOP actually being made to have one.

Not buying it. If "the filibuster" is our excuse, then I would have needed to have SEEN an actual filibuster. Seems like all I've seen is DEMS telling us to "compromise" w/o a fight b/c the GOP might threaten one.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»I have to wonder what he ...