Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,313 posts)
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:40 AM Feb 2014

Concealed-weapons ruling an assault on public safety

Updated 5:39 pm, Thursday, February 13, 2014

California's long-standing effort to reduce gun violence by largely outlawing the packing of guns in public places has come under serious challenge. A divided panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that its restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons violated the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The good news is that this 2-1 ruling is not the final word. It will be put on hold while the full appeals court decides whether to review it.

Also, it must be emphasized that this decision is an outlier among circuit-court reviews of concealed-weapons laws in New York, New Jersey and Maryland.

"There's no precedent to this court's decision that there's a right to carry a concealed weapon, especially without any need or cause," said Jonathan Lowy of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence ...


http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/editorials/article/Concealed-weapons-ruling-an-assault-on-public-5233484.php

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Concealed-weapons ruling an assault on public safety (Original Post) struggle4progress Feb 2014 OP
Poor article written by someone who either didn't read or didn't understand the court's decision. nt PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #1
LA county sheriff is going to be upset quadrature Feb 2014 #2
Loss of income for Cali sheriff's Montana redneck Feb 2014 #3
But isn't there precedent for over 100 years when the first no-carry laws Hestia Feb 2014 #4
. Doctor_J Feb 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #6
Uh, OK. and maybe the south and your state should seceed (sic), since they Doctor_J Feb 2014 #7
 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
2. LA county sheriff is going to be upset
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:54 AM
Feb 2014

my understanding is,
in most Cal counties,
the sheriff only allows his friends
and big$$$ contributors to have a CC permit.

those people are going to be pissed.

 

Montana redneck

(17 posts)
3. Loss of income for Cali sheriff's
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:22 AM
Feb 2014

The way I understand the ruling :
People have the right of self-defense
Without a shall issue or open carry rules in place California's are denied their 2nd amendment rights

 

Hestia

(3,818 posts)
4. But isn't there precedent for over 100 years when the first no-carry laws
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 12:01 PM
Feb 2014

were first enacted - all due to gun violence?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
5. .
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 03:37 PM
Feb 2014


Maybe a large majority of Californians would like to exercise their right to not have every square foot of their state infested with guns.

Response to Doctor_J (Reply #5)

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
7. Uh, OK. and maybe the south and your state should seceed (sic), since they
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 12:08 PM
Feb 2014

don't want to implement the ACA and as ward states are sucking the rest of us dry.

I'm sure your act plays better at freeperville.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Concealed-weapons ruling ...