Syria's road to hell: A hair-raising journey between Damascus and Tartous

[Jefferson23]

March 8, 2014

The road between Damascus and Tartous is so fraught with danger that the mere thought of travelling down it makes Patrick Cockburn's stomach tighten. Here, he recounts his most recent journey


In every war there is a city, a town, a mountain, a river or a road that all sides see as crucial if they are going to win, or at least avoid defeat. In the Syrian civil war, it is the road linking Damascus to Homs, Syria's third city, 100 miles to the north, which then goes west for 64 miles until it reaches the port city of Tartous on the Mediterranean coast. The route is so important because it connects the parts of Syria held by the government. If it is ever cut off permanently, it will be a crippling blow to the rule of President Bashar al-Assad.

It is a road I have got to know far too well in the past two years. When I think about driving it, I feel a tightening of the muscles in my stomach. There is nothing suicidal about the journey, but the risk is always there, and even after I have discussed the dangers involved with my careful, highly-informed and courageous driver George, a Syrian Christian, I wonder if there is something nasty ahead we don't know about.

We watch for signs that will give us advanced warning of danger, such as a lack of traffic coming towards us on the other side of the road, which could mean vehicles are being stopped by some trouble we cannot yet see. A good flow of traffic probably means that all is well, particularly if there are a lot of buses, since Syrian bus drivers go everywhere and are skilled in assessing risks. Heavy vehicles loaded high with valuable goods are also excellent news, because the driver would not be risking his cargo if he thought it might be stolen or destroyed.

I was last on this road in early February and I knew it had been closed for 17 days a month earlier after rebels captured most of the town of An Nabk, halfway to Homs. But George's mother comes from Nabk and he assured me that government troops were firmly back in control and there was no need to worry. Not everybody was so positive: an experienced foreign journalist advised me to fly to Latakia on the coast in north-west Syria and then drive south to Homs. He said that if I was going to drive to Homs from Damascus, it was worth hiring a second car to drive behind my own to make sure I was not followed. He had got through all right, but the second car had been stolen by armed bandits on the way back to Damascus.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syrias-road-to-hell-a-hairraising-journey-between-damascus-and-tartous-9172003.html

[Igel]

1. Recent news was about how bad Syria was in falling behind removing chem weapons.

They're not transporting them to the coast from inland quickly enough, they've fallen behind. There was an undercurrent of "Assad's violated the agreement, no *serious* intervention as long as he stays on schedule."

At the same time, the news was that the area the chemical weapons or their precursors would have to travel through simply wasn't safe, and convoys regularly came under attack and were in danger of being destroyed or captured.

It leads to the conclusion that many in the West want Syria to ship chemical weapons through a dangerous area in order for the containers to be destroyed, leading to a massive contamination problem or in order for the rebels to capture the chemical weapons and their precursors.

Or that many in the West just want to find an excuse to intervene more muscularly in the area because things aren't going the way they want.

[Jefferson23]

2. All valid concerns, imo. While reading the OP I could not help but find his frustrations

in reporting beyond courageous..I can't imagine myself in his position. With that said, even with
his diligence and expertise, he brings by admission, little assurances as to what can be verified
at any given point in time.

Syria is a hell hole.