New Records: IRS Targeted Progressive Groups More Extensively Than Tea Party - ThinkProgress

[Bill USA]

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2014/04/23/3429722/irs-records-tea-party/?fb_comment_id=fbc_1408195242788311_79694_1408271182780717#f3268c7e41b898c

[font size=+1"]"New Records: IRS Targeted Progressive Groups More Extensively Than Tea Party"[/font]


Elijah Cummings, Darrell ("the Reptilian"_B USA) Issa
CREDIT: AP


A series of IRS documents, provided to ThinkProgress under the Freedom of Information Act, appears to contradict the claims by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and his House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that only Tea Party organizations applying for tax-exempt status “received systematic scrutiny because of their political beliefs.” The 22 “Be On the Look Out” keywords lists, distributed to staff reviewing applications between August 12, 2010 and April 19, 2013, included more explicit references to progressive groups, ACORN successors, and medical marijuana organizations than to Tea Party entities.



The IRS provided the heavily-redacted lists to ThinkProgress, after nearly a year-long search. From the earliest lists through 2012, the “historical” section of the lists encouraged reviewers to watch out for “progressive” groups with names like “blue,” as their requests for 501(c)(3) charitable status might be inappropriate. Their inclusion in this section suggests that the concern predates the initial 2010 list.

Explicit references to “Tea Party,” included in the “emerging issues” section of the lists, also began in August 2010 — but stopped appearing after the May 10, 2011 list. From that point on, the lists instructed agents to flag all political advocacy groups of any stripe. The documents instructed the agents to forward any “organization involved with political, lobbying, or advocacy” applying for 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) status be forwarded to “group 7822? for additional review. Groups under both categories are limited in the amount of of lobbying and political activity each can undertake.

Other types of groups received explicit scrutiny for longer than “progressive” or “Tea Party” organizations. These included applicants involved with “medical marijuana” but not “exclusively education” (19 appearances in the “watch list” section of the lists), which were to be forwarded to a “group 7888? and groups believed to be possible successor-groups to ACORN, the now-shuttered Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (12 appearances on the “watch list” section). Those applications were also to be elevated to managers for further review. All 22 documents also flagged applicants with Puerto Rico addresses and certain types of “Testamentary Trusts.”
(more)

Debunking the Myth that the IRS Targeted Progressives: How the IRS and Congressional Democrats Misled America about Disparate Treatment

[roody]

1. One of my favorites, IFCO, is fighting to keep their 501c3 status.

http://ifconews.org/

[woodsprite]

2. Oh, I have some TP acquaintances who won't like hearing this :)

[frylock]

4. you can scream it in their ear, and they're still not going to hear it

[d_legendary1]

3. Won't hear this on Fixed News!

Especially if the group doesn't have a "Patriot, Liberty, or America" in the group's name.