Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumA Capitalism alternative? The Mondragon Cooperatives with Professor Fred Freundlich
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2943 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Capitalism alternative? The Mondragon Cooperatives with Professor Fred Freundlich (Original Post)
mother earth
Mar 2013
OP
mother earth
(6,002 posts)1. The Cleveland Model
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)6. This was very interesting. Thanks for posting this! (nt)
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)2. What does the world think about MONDRAGON?
I think Prof. Freundlich (in Thom Hartmann's video) is right about 'framing' Mondragon as 'a better way of doing business.' You could also frame it as "the Future of Capitalism," since ownership is still in private hands. That way, you do avoid people foaming at the mouth and screaming "soshulism, soshulism."
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)3. Richard Wolff - author of Democacy at Work, is onto this as well
I've been advocating this ever since the mid 80s, when I did my masters
thesis on examining the relative performance of 1) absentee owned, 2)
locally (w/in 50 miles owner lives), and 3) WORKER-OWNED businesses.
Both in terms of employment stability, rate of pay, and the amount of
profits that STAY in the LOCAL economy to turn over again and again,
worker ownership was THE most effective model.
Here's Richard Wolff:
We are at a juncture in History where Labor needs to make an abrupt LEFT hand
turn on a dime, to focus like a laser beam primarily on leveraging worker buyouts
of "distressed" business (the ones that vultures like Bain Capital prey upon); and
secondarily focus on both retaining extant collective bargaining contracts and on
incubating and supporting worker-owned startup businesses.
The workers can take back what's been stolen, but this is the ONLY means by which
they can; because history illustrates clearly that at the end of the day OWNERSHIP
is EVERYTHING, i.e. including that it ultimately trumps any collective bargaining
"victories" of the past, before the 1% figured out how to buy off 1/2 of the workers
to begger and bugger the other 1/2.
http://www.workerscontrol.net/authors/worker-cooperatives-united-states-historical-perspective-and-contemporary-assessment
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/12/08-6
http://www.nceo.org/
http://www.usworker.coop/front
DhhD
(4,695 posts)4. Southwest Airlines is a company owned by its workers.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)5. Cool. I didn't know that. ~nt