Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumBill Maher HD Confronts Maddow over Christie Hysteria: It's Not Watergate
Straight Outta YouTube! (That was the name of the album, wasn't it?)
Dawson Leery
(19,548 posts)Maher is a comedian.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)even scraped the surface. Bill Maher is funny and insightful but he's not infallible. He did date Anne Coulter after all.
whathehell
(30,396 posts)I think Libertarian Maher is a tad upset that Christie's coming under fire -- Tough shit, Bill -- He deserves it,
and, oh yeah, some of us are find the coverage every bit as compelling as Rachel.
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)Bill is wrong in misinterpreting the full impact of what goes on with governors and state houses and unsavory behavior.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)whathehell
(30,396 posts)I'm enjoying it myself.
Cha
(317,795 posts)fucking Christie's BRIDGEGATE-SANDYGATE@INTH DEGREE!
Get over it, Maher.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)This is the guy the Beltway held up as the all new "straight talk express" that reached across the aisle and could get the parties to work together for the common good of the nation.
Then it turns out he and his entire team are a bunch of petty vindictive children who think nothing of actually HURTING the public and pinning it on someone who refused to play with them.
ctsnowman
(1,904 posts)whathehell
(30,396 posts)Now, even more of your shitty union-busting governors seem to be going down too!
NBachers
(19,286 posts)I laugh with Bill, and often agree with his clever turns of phrase.
I respect Rachel Maddow; she is carrying our nation's journalistic obligations on her own shoulders.
Stainless
(719 posts)Let's just ignore the scandal and help Christie repair his image so he can run for President and fuck over the whole country with his cronyism and political machine politics.
Bill Maher is beginning to wear out his welcome IMHO. He should be thanking Rachel Maddow for her excellent work on this.
From what I've seen, Chris Christie is a liar and a bully and his administration is a cesspool.
BTW, who's the dim-witted Englishman?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but I kind of agree with Bill. The damage to Christie has been done now, so the reporting can back off a little. MSNBC and most of the news media do tend to be a bit East Coast-centric. When/if indictments come down, I'll be happy to hear about them.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)For Sanity of not sounding like the folks who watch Faux News. When or if Christie's indicted, it is news again. Until then, there are bigger fish to fly...like for instance, the 2 Million Estimated Unemployed and BROKE Americans who lost their Federal Extended Jobless Benefits December 28.
But Maddow is too darn busy with Christie to talk about that, we guess.
tomp
(9,512 posts)christie is a venal pig who should be nowhere near a position of responsibility. if some corporation wants to make him ceo, fine, but he should be out of elected office. he should be taken down, i.e., fully exposed. there certainly were crimes committed. these need to be investigated and prosecuted. to go easy on christie is to miss a monumental opportunity to expose the level of corruption in government in general, and in this case to punish an evil man.
dsteve01
(312 posts)I would much rather hear about things which are not highways 3,000m away. How about an investigation into that Cable merger, Rachel?
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)a highway, 3000 miles away or even next door.
The only way corruption is going to be stopped is by exposure and punishment, and that means punishment of the proper people not just fall guys. This is more than about Christie, this is about the next corrupt official thinking he or she can get away with it because Christie did, or Bush did, or (place your own favorite corrupt official here) did, and got away with it. Like it or not, getting sick of it because it's too much coverage or not, this is important stuff! And no pun intended, it's bigger than just Christie.
So do you think this story about a highway 3000 miles away should be glossed over and we all accept Christie as our next President? Maybe then we will wish for some more coverage of that "highway"?
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)Maher is taking the entire MSNBC to task for targeting Christie, so what is Maher's agenda to go after her? Maybe he doesn't get state politics and their impact on the national? A question not a conclusion btw.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Plenty of folks would LIKE to ask but will never be a position close enough to Rachel to do so. Why the heck is she hyper-focusing on Chris Christine when an estimated 2 million Americans lost their lifeline of income on December 28 when Congress refused to approve an extension of Federal Unemployment Benefits.
But, heck...those Americans are not important it appears.
Only Chris Christie and his "Bridgescandal" 24.7.365 at MSNBC.
And they are suppose to be the "progressive" channel for news. Glad to see some folks understand MSNBC is propaganda as well as other so-called CORPORATE OWNED News Stations. About time!
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)Christie is aiming for a POTUS run and if you've paid attention, he's the center of a shitstorm with unprecedented number of "pay for play" implications. If not for his aim for higher office, this all would remain a local issue. Btw the NYT raised questions before MSNBC.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Until the cows come home. But MSNBC is a NATIONAL News Network, which should be reporting variety of NATIONAL News stories. Not Chris Christie day in, day out. That's the NYT job. Let them handle that. And as for Chris Christie Presidential chances, if the Man is NOT indicted, he's running for President, period.
What Democrats need to worry about is how to beat ANY Republican, not just hyper-focusing on Chris Christie-- that runs for President.
Now can we move on from New Jersey, please.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)To report on the monopoly based mega-merger that will comprise over 54% of the cable TV marketplace and 100 million customers into Comcast hands....forget about it.
Chris Christie and his "Bridgegate" scandal is far too important than reporting on a possible monopoly of communication resources by her employer.
stopbush
(24,788 posts)that the story wasn't worth covering in the first place. We're talking about a media - MSNBC, fer chris sake - that interrupts an interview about the NSA with former CA Sen Jane Harmon to "break" the "news" that Justin Bieber got hauled into court.
I didn't see Bill Maher telling Faux News to get over Bengahzi 4 months into that "scandal." Why is he so quick to jump on MSNBC to get off Christie?
Let's remember, Rachel was doing yeoman's work covering this story for a couple of MONTHS before the MSM took any interest in it. Had she cooled her jets back in November, the scandal cover-up would have probably worked perfectly.
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)Yes, Christie is a pig and deserves to be taken down, but beating the story to death won't do it.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Benghazi was a fake scandal, Bridgegate is not...the issue is corruption, not traffic cones.
pnwmom
(110,219 posts)daybranch
(1,309 posts)Nuff said.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)But would be a nice change of pace from Chris Christie "Bridgegate" 24.7.365.
barbtries
(31,224 posts)this cannot go away and it goes so much deeper than the bridge closure. christie is corrupt! and now he's going to get caught. that is news.
i hope she leans just as hard on McRory here in NC. and i wish the rest of the news world would start reporting on it.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)whathehell
(30,396 posts)markpkessinger
(8,887 posts)I generally enjoy Bill Maher, but I think he is flat wrong about this. The scandal is now much wider than the question of whether Christie knew about or authorized the shutdown of three out of the four local access tollbooths to the George Washington Bridge. Christie's statements about when he found out about the closures have been contradictory, and the statement he made in his marathon press conference about his staff's lack of knowledge has been proven by documentary evidence to be outright false. Federal investigators appear now to be focusing in on the attempted cover-up of what happened as much as they are focused on the actual event. And in that respect, it seems to me this scandal very much parallels Watergate.
And also very much like Watergate, the investigation of one incident has led to uncovering evidence that seems to point to other scandals, some of which are potentially much more serious than the Bridge thing. We now have major questions concerning: (1) the Christie administration's alleged attempted shakedown of the Mayor of Hoboken over its much-needed share of Federal disaster relief moneys, of which Christie was the trustee, in order to extract approval of a development project proposed by a developer who was a client of of the law firm of David Samson, who was Christie's appointee to the chairmanship of the Port Authority; (2) of Christie's simultaneous redirection of $6 million in federal Sandy relief monies to the construction of an affordable housing complex for senior citizens in the town of Belleville, where there was relatively minor storm damage and whose Democratic mayor, unlike the mayor of Hoboken, agreed to endorse Chistie'e re-election bid; and (3) Christie's abuse of his influence at the Port Authority to create a position for his former ally David Wildstein, whose only function, according the Port Authority's Executive Director, was to serve as Christie's political operative, to name just three.
I'm sorry, but for a man who is (or was) a very likely prospect to be the GOP's 2016 nominee for President, scandals such as these, as well as the culture of corruption to which they point, are most definitely worthy of the kind of detailed reporting that Rachel Maddow, and also Steve Kornacki, have provided. Oh, and that reminds of of yet another parallel to Watergate. Those of us who are old enough to remember Watergate will also remember how many people, both among the media and the general public, said things like, "What's the big deal about a petty burglary?"
mrchips
(97 posts)It's uglier than Watergate. This involves extortion, bribery and sums of money in the billions.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)And the effects can ripple out well past New York and New Jersey into other states and even regions.
What Christie has done through the power of the Port Authority is larger than just New Jersey, this is not just a local story. That someone would use that power for petty vindictiveness is almost unbelievable and leads to the question, what else are they capable of?
It also looks like the hierarchy of the Port Authority needs to be re-examined.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)she takes the GWB home. She told me it took her 4 hours to get home during the lane closures. She told me it takes her less that 30 minutes to get home on a normal day.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)he doesn't realize that he needs to STFU.
Yeah what if woodward and bernstein had stopped their delving into the facts. God! He pisses me off sometimes and yes, 90% of the time I can stand him. Rachel is a national treasure and a real reporter.
rurallib
(64,616 posts)to be a very corrupt, venal little almost mob boss and this is news that should fade?
I don't think so. Of course I remember so many wailing about Watergate being way overblown.
90-percent
(6,955 posts)One really excellent thing about MSNBC's excessive coverage of Christie is that each revelation shows once again just how corrupt and venal the people that run things in America really are. He went from Top Presidential Contender to political capital punishment in what, about four months?
Think about the potential for ridding our political system of outright corruption and cronyism if the same journalistic scrutiny were applied to gov. Scott Walker, Gov. Reptilian Scott and Gov. Pat McCrory???????
Just to name a few, and there's plenty to name.
What I do not like about MSNBC blanket converage is that it's displacing a debate on the TPP, net neutrality, the actual cost of the recent wars and the new and alarming concept of the "DEEP STATE"* - the self perpetuating real government that does what it wants, will of the electorate be damned.
Christie is indeed a big big brick in the wall, but there's a lot of other things going on that are determining whether American Democracy will survive or be replaced by an Oligarchy?
All my education was geared towards an understanding of how precious our Democracy was, in the baby boom era where Democracy statistically really was hell of a lot fairer than it is now.
All we want is a level playing field. not the corporate authoritarian landmine riddled thing we all have to contend with now.
-90% Jimmy
*http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/21/anatomy-of-the-deep-state/#.UwnsWznVk8w.facebook
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)"One really excellent thing about MSNBC's excessive coverage of Christie is that each revelation shows once again just how corrupt and venal the people that run things in America really are"
Governor McDonnell.
Every state should be examined.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)and, of course, most people don't even know our governor's name now that it's not Sarah, but I'm here to tell you that Sean Parnell and his oily cronies are doing far more harm to this state than Sarah ever thought of doing.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)But Rachel and the Crew at MSNBC is hyper-focused on Christie. Meanwhile, I find myself turning to CNN and Al Jazeera more, and liking it.
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)You're disgusted with the coverage but the Jersey, NYC media market is gigantic compared to the rest of the country and with Christie's POTUS dream eventually there will be either indictments or resignation from the big guy.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)WOW! Thanks....I'll remember that when the telecommunications/cable market becomes bigger for one Mega-Corporation named Comcast that MSNBC happens to be owed by with buying out Time-Warner. And where are the stories about this possibly mega-merger on MSNBC? I mean this is HUGE NEWS impacting approximately 100 MILLION Subscribers. Much bigger than the Chris Christie scandal.
But MSNBC is died silent on it. Interesting....
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)When have they ever gone after one another?
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)The Mega-Merger is a story MSNBC refused to cover because they are owned lock, stock and barrel by Comcast. Deflection is not working in this case here...FYI.
BeyondGeography
(40,941 posts)If Bridgegate isn't Watergate, neither was bullying teachers and common citizens at town hall meetings, a supposedly "refreshing" form of "leadership," worth the endless droolfests that built Christie up in the first place. The irony that appears to be lost on Maher (didn't see the clip or the show) is that the pro-Christie side of MSNBC made him into a target as much or more than anyone.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)rocktivity
(45,003 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 23, 2014, 05:30 PM - Edit history (1)
while amazing things continue to happen."And that's the bottom line.
Unlike with Blago, who did only two or three lousy things, lousy things have been parading out of Bridge(t)-Gate by the dozens -- and that's MSNBC's fault?
As for that guy who accuses MSNBC of trying to take Christie down, does he also complain about the media outlets who have been trying to build him up? "Oooh, he's sooooo firm, but so fair! Democrats love him, too! He's the dreamiest thing out of New Jersey since Bon Jovi!" Now that it turns out that "Governor Soprano" has been building his "popularity" on a foundation of bullying, extortion and conflicts of interests, why isn't anyone asking why THEY missed the boat?
Watergate began with a 911 call about an office building break-in; Bridge(t)-Gate began with a local reporter wondering why a lane closure protocol hadn't been followed. Watergate eventually involved a U.S. President, Bridge(t)-Gate involves a governor who was shaping up for a presidential run (no matter what Maher says). Maher should be thanking Rachel for possibly stopping him in his tracks.
P.S. You'll find the dozens of lousy things at DU-er Laxman's Christie Crime Digest.
rocktivity
DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)Can anyone tell me a larger area anywhere in the USA?
Of course it is a huge scandal and should be constantly discussed.
The Tunnel Project that was cancelled by Christie, he lied about the facts for cancelling, affects the commutes of millions of people to NYC for the next 20 years.
It also came at a time when Obama wanted to invest in infrastructure, and create jobs. Christie help nix both.
And now the story is moving into Federal Sandy funds... this is a MUCH BIGGER story than most people realize.
Did I mention this guy might want to run for President of the United States!
Now go back and rethink this.. WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE A BIGGER STORY?
stopbush
(24,788 posts)build that tunnel and hijacked it into NJ coffers to be spent elsewhere.
Why isn't that being investigated?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)mountain grammy
(28,821 posts)I'm sending you a note.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)It is a huge story and it should be on every network, all the time, until Christie is driven from office.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)It was a third-rate burglary that opened a can of worms that took more than 2 years to run its course.
Blue Owl
(58,626 posts)n/t
