Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumShrike47
(6,913 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)they were useful idiots but were seen as a threat to his power once he took over.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Their victims on the other hand do not. So there's that.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)1monster
(11,045 posts)the other guy who was soooo insulted. The point was that one group thought to use another group to get power thinking they could control them after power was achieved ... then the OUTRAGED interruption. (And, of course, we know how THAT--the 1920s-30s situation-- worked out.)
It was good similie, however, some people are so afraid of the comparison to any point of Nazism that they refuse to look beyond the N**ism word.
His point on ideologue is well made also.
edit for clarification
fireflysky46
(224 posts)they are just stupid.
Even too stupid to be Nazis.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)They were actually fascist instead; but even back then 'fascism' sounded worse. A case of mislabeling which still today contributes to needless fear of true socialism.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,477 posts)When someone says "The Nazis were socialists, just look at the name of the party", respond "So you believe, based on the name, that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a democracy. Just look at the name."
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)The problem here is, although most of these people have heard of Nazis, their knowledge doesn't extend to the party's original formal name. They never heard of the ILWU, the AFL-CIO, etc either. But if you say the word 'union', they'll swear at you and call you a gd commie.
In little over 8 years, I've been asked THREE TIMES who the aitch is Bob Dylan. Just about the saddest thing I've heard here, though, was when a guy bragged to me that his girlfriend was a real intellectual, having 'almost made it through 11th grade'. Jethro Beaudine in real life, especially with a McCoy-Hatfield mean streak, is no joke.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)a Neo Nazi group
so are they Nazi's. eh who dabbled in the occult.. maybe hello stupid.
but certainly Neo Nazi's
valerief
(53,235 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,345 posts)The whole conversation was engaging, but that particular comment was the least of the salient points, and easily passed over.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)It announces to the world "I don't know shit about history and I don't even know that I'm ignorant"
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Shemp Howard
(889 posts)This sort of thing bothers me for a couple of reasons.
1. As fireflysky46 noted, most Tea Party members are not evil, just stupid or misguided. It is unethical to call them nazis.
A relative of mine believes the US needs a huge and expensive military. The nazis believed in a huge and expensive military. Does that make my relative a nazi? Of course not.
2. When "nazi" gets thrown around so casually, the word gets diluted. There are REAL neo-nazis about, both here and abroad. Save the word for when it actually fits the situation.
And as a side note, here's an interesting article. It's about Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)HoosierRadical
(390 posts)most Nazis were stupid and misguided. Tea Party is against national healthcare reform, the raising of the minimum wage and anything that would seek to dismantled institutionalize racism...that's EVIL.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)horrors. This idea that they must not be invoked is absurd. Daft. And worse, it serves the worst people on earth. Most Nazis were just stupid and misguided. Still are.
The Nazis did not 'believe in a strong military' they built an invasion force with great intent and used it to take other people's territory. When the US military captured Germany along with the allies, we gave it back to the Germans. Can you see a difference there? Does your 'relative'? Or does that relative also want to annex Baja and invade Canada? If the relative does, relative is much like a Nazi.
radiclib
(1,811 posts)..and can't hold two thoughts at the same time. Which is sadly true of most Americans.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)I believe it so strongly I know it, i think it is evident to all
griloco
(870 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)The Nazi comparison isn't a stretch to me, but sadly it sort of plays like one.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)He was laying the foundation for a salient point which was, How can so many good people go so terribly wrong?
The second yappy guy went all Godwin.
Credit where credit is due.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,477 posts)In the 1920s, the German right wing establishment thought "We can control the Nazis". It turned out they were wrong. Similarly, the Republican establishment thought, "We can control the Tea Party." Similarly, they were wrong.
He was making an historical analogy, not saying "The Tea Party are Nazis".
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)although it's still also true that if something walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, I think dinner's on the way.
1monster
(11,045 posts)Besides, they guy did not call anyone a Nazi.
The problem with not being allowed to make analogies is that we cannot learn from the past... That analogy does not in any way say that the tea party are Nazis. It simply shows the possiblilty of one group trying to use another group only to find out that it was the second group that used the first.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)lobodons
(1,290 posts)google 14 signs of facism
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)he said they were used like Nazis.