Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
2. As we descend into. 3rd World Country. These highway shakedowns are going on all over.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 01:04 PM
Sep 2014

There was an very interesting article in the New Yorker about this a few months ago. If you are traveling with children and refuse to give up the cash 'voluntarily', they tell you they will jail you and put the children in foster care. It's horrendous abuse.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
3. How dead is irony: Russia pointing its fingers at US and screaming corruption.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 01:17 PM
Sep 2014

Long live Pussy Riot
Putin to the war crimes tribunal

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
12. This isn't "Russia" saying it -- here is a link from the CBC
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:59 PM
Sep 2014
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/american-shakedown-police-won-t-charge-you-but-they-ll-grab-your-money-1.2760736

It took me about 20 seconds to type "Canadian government warns travelers about U.S. police" into Google and discover that yes, in fact, this story is real. But I guess some folks find it more comforting to dismiss a particular source rather than to find out for themselves if a story is true or not.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
14. Right . . .
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:08 PM
Sep 2014

. . . So you already knew the substance of the report was true, but instead of acknowledging that, you merely tried to discredit the source.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
15. You seem unclear on the concept.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:19 PM
Sep 2014

I didn't try to discredit the source; the source lack creditability whatsoever, and anyone citing RT when they could be citing WaPo is suspect.

Propaganda uses aspects of the truth to lead to its lies and distortions or just its omission of context. I am fully aware of this horrendous practice, but I'm not going to let a dictatorship's mouthpiece use it to distract from its own human rights abuses. Would you support the use of some neo-Nazi news service or the North Korean state media as long as "The substance of the report was true"? I hope not.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
16. The intent of the OP was to share the substance of the story . . .
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:45 PM
Sep 2014

. . . But rather than acknowledge a story you already knew to be substantively true, you chose to focus on the credibility of the source. It's one thing to do that if a source's (subjectively determined) level of credibility bears on the underlying truth of the story, and quite another to do it when you know the story to be substantively true, and at the same time fail to acknowledge the truth of the story. And this story hasn't distracted me one bit from Putin's own human rights abuses; but neither will I allow the mere fact that it has been reported by RT (among many other outlets) distract from a report of very real abuses going on right here at home.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
17. you're wrong, of course
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:06 PM
Sep 2014

anyone (but you) can easily see I readily endorse the truth of the story, but warn against using tainted sources from the enemies of freedom, enemies of human rights. The rampant acceptance among otherwise progressive people to accept RT is an ongoing disaster and I refuse to be silent on it. The OPer should've used the WaPo source, and every decent progressive should reject the use of RT as a source, like they would reject sourcing some neo-Nazi website just because the article itself happened to be true (and even FOX is mostly rejected as a source--but RT isn't? It's nutso). Again, tolerate RT and this mindless form of fake-progressivism at your (our) own peril

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
8. Presumably. However depending on where you're going
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:12 PM
Sep 2014

you may be able to get by with a large bag of carefully selected trade goods.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
6. stopped clock syndrome
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 03:31 PM
Sep 2014

actually, propaganda syndrome--propaganda always uses some truth to present the bigger package of lies

daschess1987

(192 posts)
18. It's more credible than our news or RT.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:55 PM
Sep 2014

I did say that this report was accurate, so there really wasn't any reason for you to get annoyed (unless you're a big fan of RT).

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
9. Lol. They ought to warn about Americans who won't get up off their cable-watching chairs and
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:15 PM
Sep 2014

change this. Given that there are a LOT more of them the better story is why we live with it in a so-called Democracy.

Because it may be that, deep down inside, too many people like it this way. Which is way scarier for the country than any jack-booted-murdering -thug-so-called-police-officer.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
10. We do travel in America
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:23 PM
Sep 2014

I am a permanent resident of Canada and a US citizen; I travel on a US passport. I truly fear my home country and its police forces. I also fear all the guns carried by people in the US. I do not travel with money and work hard to make sure I do not break any traffic laws. Have you tried driving the Garden State Parkway without exceeding the speed limit? 'Tis a nightmare! Fortunately, I do understand how corrupt law enforcement is in the US, so I take extra precautions to be safe. I feel much safer traveling in Mexico, which I do frequently.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Canadian Government warns...