Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I believe marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman." -- Hillary Clinton in 2004. (Original Post) L0oniX Jun 2015 OP
That's got to hurt a couple here Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #1
Bernie has not changed on this issue. Others have. L0oniX Jun 2015 #7
ok. I guess both sides have found a way around not posting something in the General Discussion: still_one Jun 2015 #8
I suppose that I am as guilty as Hilary. olegramps Jun 2015 #19
This is an excellent example of how values within a culture change rock Jun 2015 #2
Yes, Hillary will shift her values any time she thinks voters have shifted. We get that. djean111 Jun 2015 #4
Psychic are we? rock Jun 2015 #6
It doesn't take psychic powers, merely the power of observation. MNBrewer Jun 2015 #47
So you can tell when she thinks voters have changed their minds rock Jun 2015 #54
Don't need a psychic. Polls tell most politicians when to change their minds. Autumn Jun 2015 #72
+1 L0oniX Jun 2015 #9
Isn't that what a leader does - implement policy that his/her constituents want? George II Jun 2015 #24
Yes rock Jun 2015 #30
That response looks great cprise Jun 2015 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author moobu2 Jun 2015 #31
So the weather-vane policy is great, and she stands, personally, for nothing. Okay. djean111 Jun 2015 #33
Real leaders don't jump on an issue only after it becomes popular Mnpaul Jun 2015 #35
In other words, she's not a real leader, she's just merely a politician AZ Progressive Jun 2015 #43
Not when its about protecting unpopular minorities from discrimination. cprise Jun 2015 #62
if you think about it, that is actually the opposite of a leader virtualobserver Jun 2015 #77
Evolution 6chars Jun 2015 #11
. Wilms Jun 2015 #17
+1 BeanMusical Jun 2015 #55
That is apt... cprise Jun 2015 #59
The question is, why did the value within the culture change? Was it the right thing to do? A Simple Game Jun 2015 #21
You seem to be confusing leading and representing the constintuency rock Jun 2015 #57
And also confusing the plight of unpopular minorities with programs and initiatives cprise Jun 2015 #63
You're right someone is confused. You seem to be equating A Simple Game Jun 2015 #64
I didn't think you'd get it rock Jun 2015 #67
One of us doesn't get that the President is the LEADER of the free world. Not the follower, A Simple Game Jun 2015 #68
A nit to pick with your rhetoric. delrem Jun 2015 #70
And a good nit it is. I don't normally call our Presidents "leader of the free world" A Simple Game Jun 2015 #88
Heh, that's EXACTLY why I gave that example! n/t delrem Jun 2015 #94
I'd vote for Howard Sprague Fairgo Jun 2015 #87
Me too Frances Jun 2015 #52
so? The President also used to believe that, and has changed 180 degrees on that as has Hillary still_one Jun 2015 #3
Duplicity - The Video Never Lies cantbeserious Jun 2015 #5
Hillary is intelligent, educated and a person who experienced the 60's. jalan48 Jun 2015 #10
As late as 11 years ago....math is your friend. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #13
That's the point isn't it? Only 11 years ago she was speaking like this. jalan48 Jun 2015 #20
Only 11 years ago is the point and she was speaking like this because the nation agreed with her. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #25
I guess if you want a candidate that is status quo then Hillary is your woman. jalan48 Jun 2015 #36
maybe someone close came out to her since then 6chars Jun 2015 #37
So it had to apply to her before she would reconsider? navarth Jun 2015 #66
To be fair Her Iraq vote was 12 years ago. L0oniX Jun 2015 #92
How many years ago was her Iraq vote? L0oniX Jun 2015 #40
I believe folks can sincerely have a change of mind and heart. Thanks for pointing this out. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #12
They better ...if they want more votes. L0oniX Jun 2015 #14
Sure, some people can sincerely have a change of heart. But I don't think that applies to Clinton. totodeinhere Jun 2015 #32
Of course we all are entitled to our personal assessments of trust of others. Trust IS the issue. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #34
Rec'd ibewlu606 Jun 2015 #15
Our Nominee! onehandle Jun 2015 #16
At that point in time her social "evolution" had yet to pass this test: NorthCarolina Jun 2015 #18
LMAO L0oniX Jun 2015 #39
Lol! BeanMusical Jun 2015 #56
I'm glad she changed her view - TBF Jun 2015 #22
She will.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #50
Is there a point to your 11 year old video? How long did it take for you to find this? George II Jun 2015 #23
It is a positive sign when such non-contextualized and antique attacks on another comes to this. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #26
Antique ... GeorgeGist Jun 2015 #89
probably like 10 seconds Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #28
If gay marriage had not become politically popular would she have changed her homophobic totodeinhere Jun 2015 #27
actions speak louder than words! Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #29
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Jun 2015 #38
People who claim they never had to grow & evolve on any issue will also claim..... Hekate Jun 2015 #41
That was what was politically expedient then... corkhead Jun 2015 #42
I just wonder if Bernie had said that 10 years ago zeemike Jun 2015 #44
JFK was once a member of America First... iandhr Jun 2015 #45
and most Republicans are still stuck in the Dark Ages and do not want riversedge Jun 2015 #46
If she's the Dem candidate..... wolfie001 Jun 2015 #48
Any way the wind blows. Curmudgeoness Jun 2015 #49
She's a chamelion willbee Jun 2015 #51
She'd say anything... Helen Borg Jun 2015 #53
This speech is nauseating. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #58
Her newer speeches are worse, I think cprise Jun 2015 #61
~ L0oniX Jun 2015 #75
She leans neocon whenever she can, and liberal when she must. cprise Jun 2015 #60
A B S O L U T E L Y !! YOHABLO Jun 2015 #86
For a sophisticated woman of the world…. zentrum Jun 2015 #69
Wow. She sure dressed the part for that humdinger of a religious sermon. nt delrem Jun 2015 #71
wow DonCoquixote Jun 2015 #73
There doesn't seem to be any issue she won't flip-flop on Doctor_J Jun 2015 #74
It was 11 years ago. Let it go. bluestateguy Jun 2015 #76
Her Iraq vote was 12 years ago ...let's let that go too. L0oniX Jun 2015 #91
And again here she is with Chris Matthews. pa28 Jun 2015 #78
I'm not a supporter of Presidential candidate Clinton (though if she wins the primary...) tavalon Jun 2015 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author moobu2 Jun 2015 #80
The biggest problem with this speech is that Hillary chose to use Christian Conservative Maedhros Jun 2015 #82
Whats she talking bout silenttigersong Jun 2015 #81
I was not in favor of gay marriage 11 years ago. redstateblues Jun 2015 #83
The point is silenttigersong Jun 2015 #84
Oh well, that's what everybody thought in 2004, right? Why we've all ''evolved'' on this YOHABLO Jun 2015 #85
Yea we've evolved from those voting for the Iraq war way way way back in 2003 too. L0oniX Jun 2015 #90
Pure, unadulterated oppurtunism. I'd bet a hundred bucks she Indepatriot Jun 2015 #93
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
7. Bernie has not changed on this issue. Others have.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:04 AM
Jun 2015

It's good that they have changed but I got to wonder if the change is because of politics as in ...say anything to get elected.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
8. ok. I guess both sides have found a way around not posting something in the General Discussion:
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:05 AM
Jun 2015

Primaries group, and still get their political digs in then.

Appreciate the heads up

olegramps

(8,200 posts)
19. I suppose that I am as guilty as Hilary.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:31 AM
Jun 2015

I was of the same opinion ten years ago, but I have definitely changed my mind on this subject. I have proposed that religious organizations should not be able to perform weddings, but free to provide their religious rituals. In Europe, such as in the Netherlands, the state oversees the contractual agreement and then couples can choose to have a religious ceremony. I think that this would put the subject in a more proper light rather than attempting to blend what is a contractual agreement with religion making it two separate issues.

rock

(13,218 posts)
2. This is an excellent example of how values within a culture change
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:00 AM
Jun 2015

Then this was the mores of the country. The culture has shifted in that relatively short time. Thanks for reminding us.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. Yes, Hillary will shift her values any time she thinks voters have shifted. We get that.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:02 AM
Jun 2015

rock

(13,218 posts)
54. So you can tell when she thinks voters have changed their minds
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:37 PM
Jun 2015

And you're not psychic?

Response to George II (Reply #24)

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
33. So the weather-vane policy is great, and she stands, personally, for nothing. Okay.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:06 AM
Jun 2015

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
35. Real leaders don't jump on an issue only after it becomes popular
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:11 AM
Jun 2015

That sounds more like a follower. Real leaders drive the discussion on issues that aren't that popular but are the right thing to do.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
62. Not when its about protecting unpopular minorities from discrimination.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 03:57 PM
Jun 2015

Instead Hillary advanced the idea that gay marriage detracted from married hetero people, as if it were some zero-sum equation where things were given to people at the expense of other people.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
77. if you think about it, that is actually the opposite of a leader
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:50 PM
Jun 2015

An actual leader does the right thing, then persuades the people that it is right.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
21. The question is, why did the value within the culture change? Was it the right thing to do?
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:41 AM
Jun 2015

Was Hillary wrong to believe the way she did in the first place? By your little happy gay pride flag I have to conclude you think she was wrong.

So if this was the mores of the country and this is what Hillary believed has she now changed because the mores have changed? If so then she is following and not leading, that's a bad bullet item on a resume when applying to be the leader of a Country.

We must always questions people's beliefs and motives when they are against civil rights, always.

rock

(13,218 posts)
57. You seem to be confusing leading and representing the constintuency
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:58 PM
Jun 2015

OK, it is complicated. But I'll try to explain as clearly as I can. Whether it is right for a politician to lead the constituency or follow it does not have a simple-minded rule. You may want to watch this episode of "The Andy Griffith Show" starting about 18:55.



Aunt Bee adopts the approach that I call, "What the people want the people shall get!" This is in general the proper solution. But in this episode, Howard, shows that sometimes it's necessary to lead the people and offer an alternative solution.

If you think I'm off my rocker (pun intended), that's OK. Go about you're business and don't worry about it.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
63. And also confusing the plight of unpopular minorities with programs and initiatives
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 04:15 PM
Jun 2015

...stuff that politicians "give" to people as a part of some material goal. When unpopular groups have their civil rights trampled, politicians should not jump on bandwagons that make those groups look like 'attackers' or 'takers' or anything of the sort.

Politicians who treat these basic rights issues like just any other issue -- like subsidies for new research or development or government-provided service -- are willing to play very dangerous games with our lives. Its no surprise to me this fickle blindness comes from Mrs. NAFTA; a person who quietly served on the Walmart Board of Directors while the company attacked unions and worker rights.

That's a good clip, BTW.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
64. You're right someone is confused. You seem to be equating
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 04:35 PM
Jun 2015

someone running to be a Representative with someone that is running for President. One represents, bet you can't guess which one, and the other is the leader of a nation. Bet you can't guess what the leader of a nation does.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
68. One of us doesn't get that the President is the LEADER of the free world. Not the follower,
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jun 2015

not the pollster, not the finger in the wind person, the LEADER.

One of us doesn't get that a good leader must know the right thing to do before most others even get out of bed.

No, it's not that hard.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
70. A nit to pick with your rhetoric.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 06:52 PM
Jun 2015

e.g. GWB wasn't "the leader of the free world", unless you want to redefine the term "free".

He was the POTUS and, as as the MSM likes to drill into us, the Commander in chief of the US Army and Navy.
GWB wasn't elected by anyone except US citizens. I'm not a citizen of the USA and I resent the endless repetition of a mantra that corrupt or simply inept politicians like GWB are "leaders of the free world". We have our own problems in Canada, Europe, Africa, Asia, etc., and US politicians like GWB were not elected by the rest of the world to solve them for us - much as politicans like GWB like to use military power to impose their "solutions".

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
88. And a good nit it is. I don't normally call our Presidents "leader of the free world"
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 06:57 AM
Jun 2015

but that is a title often given by the media and others. As for the example you use, I have never referred to him as my President nor was he even legally elected the first time and probably not the second time either.

My point was to state that a President should be a leader not a follower, poll taker, or hold their finger to the wind.

As for Bush, I would never foist him upon anyone nor did I want him myself.

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
87. I'd vote for Howard Sprague
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 06:27 AM
Jun 2015

Or maybe Earnest T Bass. Now theres a man who spoke his mind.

Frances

(8,588 posts)
52. Me too
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:31 PM
Jun 2015

I think that Hillary and those of us who came to understand this issue over a period of time deserve credit for changing our minds.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
3. so? The President also used to believe that, and has changed 180 degrees on that as has Hillary
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:01 AM
Jun 2015

jalan48

(14,914 posts)
10. Hillary is intelligent, educated and a person who experienced the 60's.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:07 AM
Jun 2015

To see her speak like this as late as 2004 makes me seriously question her values and sincerity.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
25. Only 11 years ago is the point and she was speaking like this because the nation agreed with her.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:56 AM
Jun 2015

Only 11 years ago.

jalan48

(14,914 posts)
36. I guess if you want a candidate that is status quo then Hillary is your woman.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:13 AM
Jun 2015

Personally, Id like to see someone who has a vision of the future, a leader, not someone who simply reflects the beliefs and prejudices of the masses.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
37. maybe someone close came out to her since then
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:20 AM
Jun 2015

when it becomes personal and not just theoretical, a lot of people have changed their views.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
12. I believe folks can sincerely have a change of mind and heart. Thanks for pointing this out.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:17 AM
Jun 2015

Look at the Dixie Swastika...the whole nation had a change of heart and mind!

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
32. Sure, some people can sincerely have a change of heart. But I don't think that applies to Clinton.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jun 2015

Her "change of heart" was purely political. The only thing that changed with her was her political calculations. I would rather support someone like Bernie who has supported gay rights during his entire long political career, not just recently.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
34. Of course we all are entitled to our personal assessments of trust of others. Trust IS the issue.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:09 AM
Jun 2015
 

ibewlu606

(160 posts)
15. Rec'd
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:20 AM
Jun 2015

The political winds are changing, and Hillary "finger in the air" Clinton is astute enough to know when to shift her views. If there is enough groundswell against the corporate takeover of America, she will abandon her corporate masters.........at least until she is sworn in, and then it's business as usual in prostituting herself to the highest corporate bidder.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
26. It is a positive sign when such non-contextualized and antique attacks on another comes to this.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:57 AM
Jun 2015

To answer your question - Fox?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
28. probably like 10 seconds
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:59 AM
Jun 2015

there are also the other ones out there. She is good at sticking her finger in the winds and saying what people want to here in her closed invitation only events.

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
27. If gay marriage had not become politically popular would she have changed her homophobic
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:59 AM
Jun 2015

position? Who is naive enough to believe that she would? Contrast her with Bernie who had the political courage to support full gay rights back when it was a politically risky position.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
29. actions speak louder than words!
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:01 AM
Jun 2015

She has done nothing except carry out the presidents executive orders

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
41. People who claim they never had to grow & evolve on any issue will also claim.....
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:40 AM
Jun 2015

.....they were born potty trained.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
42. That was what was politically expedient then...
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:44 AM
Jun 2015

this >>><<< is what's politically expedient now.






zeemike

(18,998 posts)
44. I just wonder if Bernie had said that 10 years ago
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 12:24 PM
Jun 2015

Whether he would have been portrayed as evolving or whether he would be called a homophobe.
And if he had voted for the war a war monger or just misled?

Politics can produce some strange thinking.

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
45. JFK was once a member of America First...
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 12:34 PM
Jun 2015

... LBJ used to oppose civil rights before the civl rights act and the voting rights act. Elizabeth Warren was once a Republican.


Peoples views and out looks change for a better and we should welcome those people who once didn't see the light.

Fridays ruling wouldn't have been possible if people who once opposed equality didn't change their minds.


riversedge

(80,811 posts)
46. and most Republicans are still stuck in the Dark Ages and do not want
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 12:44 PM
Jun 2015

to progress. I am glad Hillary has advanced in her thinking (along with Obama and countless others in the USA).

wolfie001

(7,667 posts)
48. If she's the Dem candidate.....
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:08 PM
Jun 2015

....I'm voting for her but all things being equal, that was no "Profile in Courage" moment.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
49. Any way the wind blows.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:19 PM
Jun 2015

But I am still glad that she finally came around. Just makes me wonder though.

willbee

(15 posts)
51. She's a chamelion
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jun 2015

and a very wealthy one. She'll be whoever you want her to be.
However, when you wash out the hair dye, strip off the outer layers, and get down to the grit, she's the same old leopard with the same old big money spots.
Hillary Clinton is one of the main reasons people should vote for Bernie Saunders.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
61. Her newer speeches are worse, I think
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 03:47 PM
Jun 2015

The way she half-heartedly borrows progressive slogans and points makes me cringe. The Fox news types attack Hillary whenever she does this, because its easy to tell that she and her people are not capable of adequately defending those positions. They sense the insincerity like sharks sense blood in the water; She is the type of 90s 'liberal' they are used to getting their way with.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
86. A B S O L U T E L Y !!
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 01:27 AM
Jun 2015

Who do you think she's going to work for on foreign policy, the people of the U.S or the Pentagon?

zentrum

(9,870 posts)
69. For a sophisticated woman of the world….
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 06:07 PM
Jun 2015

….seems odd to let public opinion/mores decide on civil rights.

Glad Bernie has always had clarity on the difference between what's popular and what's constitutionally right.

DonCoquixote

(13,961 posts)
73. wow
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 09:09 PM
Jun 2015

certain people that will yell in your face and accuse you of homophobia are SILENT now. Boomarking to use when I argue with said people again.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
74. There doesn't seem to be any issue she won't flip-flop on
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 09:21 PM
Jun 2015

That's why I believe nothing she says while campaigning. Her only voters will be those who want to vote for a woman - any woman - and those like corporate rule in the US (e. g. those who think that Gingrinchcare is all we deserve). What a disaster for the party and democracy in general.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
78. And again here she is with Chris Matthews.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:53 PM
Jun 2015

Chris Matthews: "Do you think New York should recognize gay marriage."

Hillary Clinton: "No."

Forward to about 2:10 for the full exchange.



It's nice that people evolve. For the benefit of the skeptical maybe she should offer a full explanation of her turnaround on a position she previously called "sacred".

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
79. I'm not a supporter of Presidential candidate Clinton (though if she wins the primary...)
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:01 PM
Jun 2015

That said, I am pleased at how many people are changing their minds about various equality terms these days. Kudos to those who have changed their previously incorrect stances. Welcome to the flock. The more the better.

Response to L0oniX (Original post)

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
82. The biggest problem with this speech is that Hillary chose to use Christian Conservative
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:56 PM
Jun 2015

messaging - "marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman."

Personally, I think she is insincere and was simply pandering to Christian Conservatives because polling at the time was stressing how much America was a "Christian nation." And I don't like that she would pander to the Right and throw the LGBTQ base under the bus.

Knowing that she is affiliated with The Family, a Christian Conservative organization, one must at least consider that her current stance is also insincere.

silenttigersong

(957 posts)
81. Whats she talking bout
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:44 PM
Jun 2015

savings bonds,lol.Sacred money,seems to me Bill and Hillary are having an affair with Goldman Sachs.Hope you die hard Clinton supporters are not too offended as its only comedy.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
83. I was not in favor of gay marriage 11 years ago.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:56 PM
Jun 2015

I am now. I have evolved. Humans do that. I am a lifelong Democrat. Does that make me an evil hypocrite? I wasn't running for anything. Some things don't change over night. Some eyes take longer to open than others. This purity test crap is getting old.

silenttigersong

(957 posts)
84. The point is
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 12:48 AM
Jun 2015

she had an opportunity to step outside her political comfort zone.She is popular because of name regonition ,therefore she had ability to influence.Or spend some "political capitol."

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
85. Oh well, that's what everybody thought in 2004, right? Why we've all ''evolved'' on this
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 01:24 AM
Jun 2015

haven't we?

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
90. Yea we've evolved from those voting for the Iraq war way way way back in 2003 too.
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:40 AM
Jun 2015
 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
93. Pure, unadulterated oppurtunism. I'd bet a hundred bucks she
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 12:41 PM
Jun 2015

believed in marriage equality back then and simply parroted the "safe" answer. IMNSHO this makes her even more unfit to lead. Detestable.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»"I believe marriage ...