Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumWho pays and who profits when the US goes to war? These excerpts were banned in Congress.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)scandalous
think
(11,641 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)A Family Business Of Perpetual War
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/03/20/a-family-business-of-perpetual-war/
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)The neocons have killed off their Republican host and setting up shop in the Democratic party:
This guy co-authored the Bush roadmap for regime change in the Middle East (developed the rationale for invading Iraq, Iran, etc...)
I feel comfortable with her on foreign policy, Mr. Kagan said, adding that the next step after Mr. Obamas more realist approach could theoretically be whatever Hillary brings to the table if elected president. If she pursues a policy which we think she will pursue, he added, its something that might have been called neocon, but clearly her supporters are not going to call it that; they are going to call it something else.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/16/us/politics/historians-critique-of-obama-foreign-policy-is-brought-alive-by-events-in-iraq.html
She vowed that in dealing with Iran, she will be tougher and more aggressive than Reagan was with the Soviet Union: You remember President Reagans line about the Soviets: Trust but verify? My approach will be distrust and verify. She also explicitly threatened Iran with war if they fail to comply: I will not hesitate to take military action if Iran attempts to obtain a nuclear weapon, and I will set up my successor to be able to credibly make the same pledge. She even depicted the Iran Deal as making a future war with Iran easier and more powerful:
Should it become necessary in the future having exhausted peaceful alternatives to turn to military force, we will have preserved and in some cases enhanced our capacity to act. And because we have proven our commitment to diplomacy first, the world will more likely join us.
https://theintercept.com/2015/09/09/hillary-clinton-goes-militaristic-hawkish-think-tank-gives-militaristic-hawkish-speech/
That shrill, two-faced war monger would not dare to repeat that Bush-era falsehood standing next to Sanders and O'Malley at debate.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Her fans keep repeating that mantra so it most be true!
cprise
(8,445 posts)(...and a war hawk)
uhnope
(6,419 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)Glad this issue sets your blinker off, though.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)And sadly no freaking end in sight. Obama just extended it.
Whose running this country? Are there threats being made to those that could stop it?
The inhumanity we have caused is deplorable and I am truly ashamed to be an American.
cprise
(8,445 posts)appear to be driving that policy. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017301771#post3
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)This is the reason they can't wait to launch a new war against Iran. They want money! This entire economy is being run this way. The only concern is for profit consequences be damned.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,354 posts)Thanks for the thread, Triana.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)And will continue the financial carnage as policy to repay her campaign donors so she can become the first female president.
America has officially gone mad.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,724 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Psychopathic CEO's of global corporations control America...They certainly control the 1%er...
Triana
(22,666 posts)It's big corporations we need to be worrying about. They're the ones controlling everything. Including the government. Citizens United bakes it right in.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)ie, Repukians, always increase the size and scope of government...stopping them and their corporate masters is 'way more difficult than getting rid of cockroaches...
valerief
(53,235 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)June 3, 2011
"Iraq is open for business, and American companies should make an effort to invest there, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Friday.
"President Obama and I and our government believe strongly that expanding economic opportunity is as essential as building democratic institutions," Clinton said while surrounded by executives from companies as far-ranging as Occidental Petroleum, JP Morgan Chase, General Electric, Microsoft and Lockheed Martin, in a round-table discussion aimed at getting companies focused on commercial opportunities in Iraq despite its current "tough environment."
... The United States, through its embassy and consulates throughout the country, stands ready to assist American companies "to help create the conditions for investment and growth that will be broadly spread and create a ladder of economic opportunity for those willing to work hard," Clinton said. "Iraqis are looking to rebuild every sector of their economy, not only their oil sector but agribusiness, transportation, housing, banking and many others."
...Thirty companies were represented at the event in the Benjamin Franklin room at the State Department. The Iraqi ambassador to the United States, Samir Sumaidaie, attended as well."
Duppers
(28,470 posts)K&R for the whole thread.
Must read articles!
Thanks for posting this Triana.