Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ed Schultz: "Time For Bernie To Get AGRESSIVE" (Original Post) liberalnarb Jan 2016 OP
Ed's debut! Cool. Gregorian Jan 2016 #1
so sad for Ed. (And is that the way Russians spell "aggressive"? lol) uhnope Jan 2016 #2
Great stuff thank you navarth Jan 2016 #3
+10 thank you, for saying what I was going to say. n/t 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #4
Exactly------------------thankyou turbinetree Jan 2016 #5
I couldn't agree more. FoxNewsSucks Jan 2016 #6
It's not a question of RT reflecting poorly on Hartmann and Schultz demwing Jan 2016 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author redstateblues Jan 2016 #9
I agree. maddiemom Jan 2016 #11
navarth, thank you! Really appreciate your post. n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2016 #12
You're welcome, I try to be of service navarth Jan 2016 #17
Glad for Comrade Ed! redstateblues Jan 2016 #7
Yeah! Not big on 'Putin Today' here either. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #10
Thank you, liberalnarb. We need a chance to see the great US American MSNBC won't employ, Judi Lynn Jan 2016 #13
The operative word being navarth Jan 2016 #18
( ._.) Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #14
He just needs to artfully defend himself from Clinton's attacks. Bernblu Jan 2016 #15
Kick…. midnight Jan 2016 #16
 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
2. so sad for Ed. (And is that the way Russians spell "aggressive"? lol)
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 12:09 AM
Jan 2016

So said for Ed, selling out to RT, the state propaganda channel funded by the fascist, homophobic, liberal-killing, journalist-murdering Kremlin.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
3. Great stuff thank you
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 12:09 AM
Jan 2016

So some DUers will tell me RT is bad.

It gives Thom Hartmann and Ed Schultz a platform. What American network is offering them that?

Maybe RT is full of shit on some other things. I won't argue that, I don't care because I don't watch the other stuff. I watch Thom Hartmann. And now Ed Schultz. Until one of these guys lies to me, don't complain to me about RT. It's no worse than American media. In this case, it's better.

my 2 cents

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
6. I couldn't agree more.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 12:59 AM
Jan 2016

How is the bias of RT any different from the bias of America's republicon corporate media?

I'll also ignore the RT pro-Putin propaganda and be GOD DAMN GLAD that Thom Hartmann & Ed Schultz have an outlet.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
8. It's not a question of RT reflecting poorly on Hartmann and Schultz
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 01:12 AM
Jan 2016

because IMO, Thom Hartmann and Ed Schultz give legitimacy to RT.

Especially with the addition of Big Ed!

Response to navarth (Reply #3)

navarth

(5,927 posts)
17. You're welcome, I try to be of service
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jan 2016

I am fully aware that most of my contributions here amount to 'me too!' posts, but once in a while I feel compelled to put my foot down. Your own contributions far exceed my own, Judi Lynn. I should be thanking you.

Judi Lynn

(160,633 posts)
13. Thank you, liberalnarb. We need a chance to see the great US American MSNBC won't employ,
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 03:25 AM
Jan 2016

due to their fascism.

This is exactly what we can use.

Hope they will extend his show, or a show with Thom to an hour.

We are starved for Ed.

What kind of buffoon would betray his stupidity by calling Ed "comrade," anyway? It's almost too clumsy, too malicious to witness.

Ed is one hell of a lot more patriotic than any troll I've ever seen, and that's a given.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
18. The operative word being
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jan 2016

'troll'. Sometimes it seems quite obvious. I wonder to myself why some posters doth protest too much.

I can ignore stuff when it's just directed at RT; I don't care one way or the other. But when questionable posters go after Thom, and now Ed.....the indication seems clear.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Ed Schultz: "Time For Ber...