Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton vs. Bernie Sanders - different sides on Monsanto & GMO food labeling (Original Post) ViseGrip Jan 2016 OP
Kick to the greatest! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #1
Do we really want to ignore this? Hillary does. tecelote Jan 2016 #2
I don't think the farmers are the demographic Sanders is trying to appeal Major Nikon Jan 2016 #3
Monsatan, Goldman Sachs, etc. Is all the evil in the world supporting Hillary? I hope not. Kip Humphrey Jan 2016 #4
pretty much, as they say money is the root.... ViseGrip Jan 2016 #5

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
2. Do we really want to ignore this? Hillary does.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jan 2016
Lobbyists for Monsanto, ExxonMobil Raise Money for Hillary Clinton---Registered lobbyists brought in more than $2 million in fundraising for the Clinton campaign, recent filings show.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-17/lobbyists-for-monsanto-exxon-mobile-raise-money-for-hillary-clinton

---

When it comes to GMOs, which side is Hillary Clinton on?
http://bangordailynews.com/2014/08/27/opinion/contributors/when-it-comes-to-gmos-which-side-is-hillary-clinton-on/

Clip:
There are three glaring problems with Clinton’s promotion of GE drought-resistant crops. First, drought-resistant seeds and crops are still in the experimental stage and make up a miniscule portion of GMO crops on the market. More than 95 percent of GE crops are corn, soy, alfalfa, canola and sugar beets, used in animal feed and in processed food products, such as high-fructose corn syrup. These crops are engineered to produce their own Bt toxins in every cell or else to withstand massive doses of herbicides, such as Monsanto’s Roundup, which are sold to farmers as companions to their GMO seeds.

Second, attempts to engineer seeds to thrive during droughts largely have failed. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, Monsanto’s DroughtGard, the only drought-resistant crop approved by the USDA so far, produces “only modest results, and only under moderate drought conditions.”

Third, according to experts at global organizations, such as the Food & Agriculture Organization, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, and the Alliance for Food Sovereignty, a transition to sustainable, regenerative agriculture — not genetic engineering — is not only the most practical way to feed the world but is absolutely essential if we want to slow and eventually reverse global warming.

---

Chemical Exposure Linked to Billions in Health Care Costs
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/03/150305-chemicals-endocrine-disruptors-diabetes-toxic-environment-ngfood/

---

A Secret History of the Monarch: How the Biotech Industry Conspired to Knock Off One of the World’s Rarest Butterflies
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/31/a-secret-history-of-the-monarch-how-the-biotech-industry-conspired-to-knock-off-one-of-the-worlds-rarest-butterflies/

---

For the sake of our children, this has to be a real concern to any Democrat running.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
3. I don't think the farmers are the demographic Sanders is trying to appeal
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

Iowa is corn and soybean country, and the overwhelming number of those farmers are GMO customers.

http://phys.org/news/2013-06-gmo-corn-soybeans-dominate.html

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary Clinton vs. Berni...