Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,331 posts) Thu Jun 7, 2012, 09:38 PM Jun 2012

The ED Show - Romney ignoring the President's jobs plan

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ED Show - Romney ignoring the President's jobs plan (Original Post) Galraedia Jun 2012 OP

I don't think romney has a soul blackmamba09 Jun 2012 #1

Yes, he is very creepy. Skinner Jun 2012 #3

Its the party of "NO" thats been our problem all along... AsahinaKimi Jun 2012 #2

Ed: "my friends" and "folks" is too Rush and "there he goes again" stinks of Reagan. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #4

blackmamba09

(16 posts)

1. I don't think romney has a soul

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Jun 7, 2012, 10:03 PM

Jun 2012

Romney can't tell the truth about anything. He is a empty creepy guy

Skinner

(63,645 posts)

3. Yes, he is very creepy.

Reply to blackmamba09 (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 8, 2012, 09:36 AM

Jun 2012

Welcome to DU, blackmamba09.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)

2. Its the party of "NO" thats been our problem all along...

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Jun 8, 2012, 01:46 AM

Jun 2012

And Now Romney blames Obama.. for this county's so called failure? All those Republicans are Nucken futz!

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

4. Ed: "my friends" and "folks" is too Rush and "there he goes again" stinks of Reagan.

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Jun 8, 2012, 10:26 AM

Jun 2012

The clip was otherwise very good, but using their terminology isn't going to turn the wingnuts around. It is simply offensive to the left.

That said, at least he's hammering nails in Rmoney's political coffin.

Reply to this discussion