Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The reason that Hillary is skittish about having a debate in New York. (Original Post) Uncle Joe Mar 2016 OP
I think that is very likely the reason. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #1
Thanks for the link, Kalidurga. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #2
NP /nt Kalidurga Mar 2016 #3
New Yorkers are much better informed about FTA issues Baobab Mar 2016 #31
Her cackle: Stand up and clap all you want, peons! thereismore Mar 2016 #4
she looks around the room with lastone Mar 2016 #10
She is holy in her eyes. But the look on her face: Who do you think you are?! You shall heel! nt thereismore Mar 2016 #58
I think she trying to figure what the next line of bullshit she can dish out....I can't stand her!!! Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #59
DUers are increasingly sounding unhinged Skittles Mar 2016 #68
Yes....I did get carried away. Pauldg47 Apr 2016 #85
That forced laugh is as phony as she is. The eyes tell the truth. bvar22 Mar 2016 #66
Cackle = Witch Nitram Apr 2016 #97
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #5
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #16
I am not getting the video. Could someone have blocked it? TryLogic Mar 2016 #6
I'm getting it, you might try clicking on it twice, perhaps your setup requires you go directly Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #9
U Tube and links to U tube videos have problems with Ghostery as of two days ago Half-Century Man Mar 2016 #29
Thanks. nt bananas Mar 2016 #52
I seriously doubt if he actually 'lost' any of the states/delegates Jennylynn Mar 2016 #7
Wow 78 posts in 15 years. Fuddnik Mar 2016 #17
Childish Much? Jennylynn Mar 2016 #21
Exactly right, JL. mac56 Mar 2016 #42
Adios, muchacha, you can join your friends on 'Ignore'. nt Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #78
well since she'll bring up 9-11 with every other word that'll bring us to FP again MisterP Mar 2016 #8
President Obama privately called Libya a "shit show." Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #11
I'll bet he regrets a hell of a lot more than that. dchill Mar 2016 #20
Although he didn't know about it, I have no doubt the private server setup did him no favors. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #23
In his final days in office, he may even have to... dchill Mar 2016 #28
Ah, cmon now! They're the best of besties! frylock Mar 2016 #63
Yeah, it's all water under the bridge, now. dchill Mar 2016 #64
And she stabbed him on hte back regarding Syria and diplomacy with Iran, no less Scootaloo Apr 2016 #83
Would it never occur to you that the situation in Lybia was a great deal more complex... Nitram Apr 2016 #98
It was a mistake and Hillary pushed for it because that's her first instinct, Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #101
I disagree, Joe. Arm-chair generals and Monday morning quarterbacks always have 20-20 hindsight. Nitram Apr 2016 #102
The advisers arguing against the intervention in Libya were using foresight, not hindsight, Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #103
And Hillary just cackles. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2016 #12
A person serious about being elected President of the U.S. should LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #13
I agree, it reflects a lack of intestinal fortitude and loss of faith in your own convictions, Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #15
It opens up an avenue for Bernie as he LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #22
Run out the clock? More like, "avoid a waste of time." Nitram Mar 2016 #34
If you consider the democratic process a "waste of time." Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #36
Hyperbole a little? The democratic process does not survive or fail depending on... Nitram Mar 2016 #43
The democratic process relies on a well informed electorate and nothing serves that better Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #46
If that's true, Unc, how many should they have at a minimum every primary? 50? Nitram Mar 2016 #51
Certainly not the pitiful amount and poorly scheduled debates first ordained by Schultz's DNC. I Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #53
They've got TV, I assume. Haven't there been 8 so far? Nitram Mar 2016 #55
What are you afraid of? passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #60
Afraid? Skittish? I'd say it is Bernie supporters who are afraid he won't get enough exposure. Nitram Mar 2016 #61
I agree, we are worried about Bernie getting exposure passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #62
Who said "democracy will fail" but you...hyperbole, indeed. n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #75
Wrong, 4life. Nitram Apr 2016 #86
It's a stretch and just a bit over the top. But, OK. n/t libdem4life Apr 2016 #89
When six mega-corporate media conglomerates control 90+% of everything the American People Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #90
Nicely put, Unc I see your point. From Bernie's point of view. Nitram Apr 2016 #93
Apparently you don't see my point, Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #99
I assume you're speaking of the T.V. which is dominated by the six corporate media conglomerates Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #67
Well, I don't watch TV. Never hooked it up. Nitram Apr 2016 #94
Well believe it or not millions if not tens in millions of Americans Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #100
What convictions might those be, Uncle Joe? pangaia Mar 2016 #69
Heh. polly7 Mar 2016 #70
LOL LOL LOL LOL pangaia Mar 2016 #72
I knew he'd get back to you. polly7 Mar 2016 #80
I had to run out on an appointment. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #81
Whew !! I was getting worried.. pangaia Apr 2016 #87
:) Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #88
Touche pangaia! I knew upon posting, that I set myself up. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #74
perhaps one amongst many stupidicus Mar 2016 #14
KnR SammyWinstonJack Mar 2016 #18
The last thing she wants is to be exposed in New York... SoapBox Mar 2016 #19
Regarding the Wall Street Transcripts. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #25
Perhaps if Hillary doesn't want to debate, as one DU member mentioned, Bernie should start A Simple Game Mar 2016 #24
I have no doubt Bernie would kick Republican ass uptown and downtown. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #27
Thank you for sharing the video. saidsimplesimon Mar 2016 #32
"Can't act. Slightly bald. Can dance a little.' TexasBushwhacker Mar 2016 #39
What a treat ! n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author Vilis Veritas Mar 2016 #79
Donald Trump agreed to debate Bernie Sanders but then Trump changed his mind. Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #49
Knr nt Rebkeh Mar 2016 #26
K&R Duval Mar 2016 #30
Clinton is not "skittish" about having a debate in NY. She is winning by a... Nitram Mar 2016 #33
Yes, Hillary is and she's trying to run out the clock. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #38
Gosh, Unc, you sure sound exercised with all your talk about pubic hairs and such. Nitram Mar 2016 #45
A self-serving "tactical decision" at the expense of a well informed electorate, what did you mean Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #50
Don't be so sure....I have heard it has closed significantly. yourout Mar 2016 #40
She would only be in trouble if Bernie won the primary. Nitram Mar 2016 #48
Bern reassures his supporters of his only Attribute Cryptoad Mar 2016 #35
That's an insanely popular position. fbc Mar 2016 #37
the problems lies in it being,,, Cryptoad Mar 2016 #41
The problem lies in you believing that this is Bernie's "only attribute." n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #47
Is Hillary that mono-dimensional? immoderate Mar 2016 #56
"Insane" being the operative word. Nitram Apr 2016 #95
I support his position on that subject. n/t Gore1FL Mar 2016 #54
That's a good start LiberalLovinLug Mar 2016 #57
That sounds like projection, my friend Scootaloo Apr 2016 #84
Don't you get tired of those old lies about Clinton being a Republican in Democrat's clothing? Nitram Apr 2016 #96
What's so funny, Madam Secretary? Just what, exactly, are you laughing at? colorado_ufo Mar 2016 #44
That cackle of hers at 1:23 doesn't do her any favors. TIME TO PANIC Mar 2016 #65
Followed by that sour expression... Ino Mar 2016 #71
There is no way Hillary could stand up to that Red Oak Mar 2016 #73
Trickle-down Hillary finds the 1% quite acceptable. Just make your living stroking Wall Street whereisjustice Mar 2016 #77
Very inspiring speech, thank you Time for change Mar 2016 #82
thanks Uncle Joe lasttrip Apr 2016 #91
Peace to you, lasttrip. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #92

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. I think that is very likely the reason.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 11:40 AM
Mar 2016

Of course it's a complete fabrication that she was ever 45% ahead in NY. It is very likely that Bernie has made some gains. I just don't think we will ever have an accurate picture from polls what those gains were and from what starting point.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511615519

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
31. New Yorkers are much better informed about FTA issues
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:08 PM
Mar 2016

they are more likely to realize that FTAs will force Americans to compete directly with the rest of the world's and the low wages of Asian countries on liberalization's "level playing field" which is inherently disadvantageous to Americans because of the high costs of educating and living here (which the same backroom deals refuse to budge on, by giving banks and corporations an entitlement to no adverse government regulations, forever.).

in other words, for natural persons, i.e. non-multinational corporations - who have no standing under FTAs except as parts of markets, to be bought and sold, things can only get worse under FTAs, never better.

 

lastone

(588 posts)
10. she looks around the room with
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:22 PM
Mar 2016

with the most quizzical look on her face, like who the fuck do you think you people are. I bet she wishes she wasn't miked up on that one!

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
58. She is holy in her eyes. But the look on her face: Who do you think you are?! You shall heel! nt
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:42 PM
Mar 2016

Pauldg47

(644 posts)
59. I think she trying to figure what the next line of bullshit she can dish out....I can't stand her!!!
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:44 PM
Mar 2016

Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Response to Post removed (Reply #5)

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
9. I'm getting it, you might try clicking on it twice, perhaps your setup requires you go directly
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:21 PM
Mar 2016

to youtube.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
29. U Tube and links to U tube videos have problems with Ghostery as of two days ago
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:54 PM
Mar 2016

You have to hit "trust the site" in the Ghostery options for the videos to play.

Jennylynn

(696 posts)
7. I seriously doubt if he actually 'lost' any of the states/delegates
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

I mean, the guy won UTAH for cripes sake!

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
8. well since she'll bring up 9-11 with every other word that'll bring us to FP again
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:21 PM
Mar 2016

Iraq, the fact that she thinks Libya's still a terrific idea, a moderate modern democracy with just a few kinks left, why she stopped bragging about backing the 2009 Honduran coup in 20014

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
11. President Obama privately called Libya a "shit show."
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

I believe he regrets allowing Hillary to persuade him to intervene in that nation.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
23. Although he didn't know about it, I have no doubt the private server setup did him no favors.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:41 PM
Mar 2016

dchill

(42,660 posts)
28. In his final days in office, he may even have to...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:52 PM
Mar 2016

Pardon his former SOS. I'm sure he's doing all he can to avoid that, of course.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
63. Ah, cmon now! They're the best of besties!
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:07 PM
Mar 2016

Who cares if Mrs. Clinton engaged in direct insubordination to Obama's request that Blumenthal stay out of State business? They're buds! You think Obama gives a shit that she set up private, unsecured server because the NSA wouldn't let her have a Blackberry? Obama has a Blackberry, so I'm sure he's all cool with it.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
83. And she stabbed him on hte back regarding Syria and diplomacy with Iran, no less
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

Any fuckwit who tries to sell the idea that Clinton is Obama's third term is hoping you're as fucking dumb as they are.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
98. Would it never occur to you that the situation in Lybia was a great deal more complex...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:10 PM
Apr 2016

... and unstable than the US and our intelligence services knew? No, it must have been pure stupidity or venality on Obama and Clinton's part. Really? I doubt Obama blames Clinton for the mess in Libya. The CIA et al are the ones who are supposed to know what's going on.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
101. It was a mistake and Hillary pushed for it because that's her first instinct,
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:45 PM
Apr 2016

regime change or war, Henry Kissinger is her mentor.

It has nothing to do with democracy or protecting the people of other nations, if that had been a major concern she wouldn't have enabled the murderous and corrupt military coup in Honduras, which created such desperate conditions parents were sending their children across our border to escape.





Honduras is another "shit show."

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
102. I disagree, Joe. Arm-chair generals and Monday morning quarterbacks always have 20-20 hindsight.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:25 PM
Apr 2016

Honduras has absolutely no connection to Libya. The so-called Arab Spring was a complex and confusing phenomenon. However, the UN backed military protection for rebels in Libya. Entire cities could have been razed in Gaddafi's quest to maintain control. It was a tough call, but I think it was probably the right one. There was no perfect solution to what was moving toward potentially catastrophic put down of a rebellion in Libya. Syria has been just as difficult, but short of allowing the Assad regime to wipe out the Sunni population that was rebelling against his rule, I don't think there was a better approach than the one Obama has reluctantly taken. There are signs that IS is beginning to crack financially an militarily.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
103. The advisers arguing against the intervention in Libya were using foresight, not hindsight,
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:01 PM
Apr 2016

Isis got a foothold there as a result.

The same held true with Iraq.

Honduras was different, in that case a democratically elected President was overthrown by the military, kicked out of his house only wearing pajamas, it was an obvious "military coup."

The rest of the world condemned it as such, but Hillary worked behind the scenes to enable it.

The result being, Honduras descended into chaos with corruption and violence rampant.

In all three cases, Iraq, Libya and Honduras, Hillary supported policies that in two cases helped to empower Isis while in the case of Honduras created extreme violence and oppression leading to a humanitarian crisis which in turn sent children risking their lives to flee across our border and Hillary's answer was to send them back.

In the case of Syria, Hillary was willing to risk an even wider war and U.S. involvement by proposing a "no fly zone" which would've brought us into direct conflict with Russia or cost our nation credibility with our allies by not enforcing it.

I'm convinced that Hillary's judgment is highly suspect and will only serve to destabilize the world whether using foresight or hindsight.

On top of that her hair trigger policies in regards to regime change or war, combined with Hillary's support of fracking for one will only exacerbate anthropological climate change, as the world's climate circumstances become ever more dire as a result, the prospects of nations fighting over dwindling resources and major war increase exponentially.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
13. A person serious about being elected President of the U.S. should
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

never turn down a challenge to debate a worthy opponent in a close race. The voters in New York deserve an opportunity to hear from both candidates in a debate format about issues important to them.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
15. I agree, it reflects a lack of intestinal fortitude and loss of faith in your own convictions,
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:27 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary is just trying to run out the clock.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
22. It opens up an avenue for Bernie as he
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

campaigns in the state to ask voters the same question. Why won't Hillary agree to a NY debate? What is she afraid of? It's a strategy on the part of her campaign that could easily backfire.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
34. Run out the clock? More like, "avoid a waste of time."
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

Why waste time on a another debate when she doesn't need to? She's winning last time I looked.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
36. If you consider the democratic process a "waste of time."
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016


Winning is not the same as won.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
43. Hyperbole a little? The democratic process does not survive or fail depending on...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:04 PM
Mar 2016

...exact the number of debates between candidates.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
46. The democratic process relies on a well informed electorate and nothing serves that better
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:07 PM
Mar 2016

than debates, this has held true since the days of Lincoln and Douglas.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
53. Certainly not the pitiful amount and poorly scheduled debates first ordained by Schultz's DNC. I
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:13 PM
Mar 2016

would think the citizens of the largest state yet to vote in the East would deserve one, don't you?

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
60. What are you afraid of?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:54 PM
Mar 2016

I'm wondering why you seem to fear Bernie debating Hillary in NY...if you aren't afraid, why are you resisting the idea so strenuously?

Every debate they have teaches us a little more about each of them. And that is a good thing, regardless of who wins the primary. Debates are the only way anyone has of really fleshing out the candidates. Not everyone has time to catch every debate, nor might they even know when they are all on. The more debates they have, the more people have an opportunity to watch one.

I don't think there is anything hyperbolic about wanting or even thinking we need more debates. I don't think we ever have enough. Many people still never even see one. In the beginning, a lot of people probably don't bother to watch them. Later in the race, when things heat up, they may make more effort to do so. Normal people have to be coaxed to participate in the political process. I think too many people on DU forget that we represent a very small segment of the population that is following politics with a passion.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
61. Afraid? Skittish? I'd say it is Bernie supporters who are afraid he won't get enough exposure.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:57 PM
Mar 2016

It is very hyperbolic about to suggest that democracy will fail if Clinton doesn't debate Bernie before NY. What are you afraid of?

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
62. I agree, we are worried about Bernie getting exposure
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:07 PM
Mar 2016

Because Clinton has always had name recognition, which was very obviously a problem in the beginning of the campaign, and still remains so today. Who wouldn't worry about that?

So of course, you wouldn't want him to get more recognition. I understand that fear. I personally think we both have a reason to worry about it.

But about your comment to Joe, that shows me you are pretty worried. You totally misconstrued what he said. He said debates are part of the democratic process, and you then converted that into "failure of the democratic process" if there is no debate.

No, not a total failure of the process...but yes, an opportunity lost for people to learn more, and that is something we should all be fighting for. I wonder how many votes Hillary would win if she did that debate? Hmmm...could be a good thing for her.

Again, you are the one who seems to be fighting this awfully hard.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
86. Wrong, 4life.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 08:43 AM
Apr 2016

Uncle Joe wrote If you consider the democratic process a "waste of time." That clearly suggests that foregoing one debate is a threat to the democratic process.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
90. When six mega-corporate media conglomerates control 90+% of everything the American People
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 02:23 PM
Apr 2016

see on television, hear on the radio or read in printed publications, debates; allowing the candidates to present their messages to the people unfiltered become a much more integral part of the democratic process.

That kind of monopoly propaganda power especially since the advent of one way, top down television and the condensation of news outlets has propelled debates to the forefront for a well functioning democracy to exist.

The vote isn't protected under such conditions, the national corporate media conglomerates have been deafeningly silent in regards to the massive voter suppression that took place in Arizona.

In a debate, Bernie or any other candidate could bring this critical issue/injustice up to the people in real time, the corporate media conglomerates have abrogated their responsibility toward a well informed electorate, so debates are all the more critical.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
93. Nicely put, Unc I see your point. From Bernie's point of view.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 02:58 PM
Apr 2016

But if I were Clinton, I'd play it cool, exactly as she is. And I've seen plenty of unvarnished, unfiltered clips of Bernie on DU - you're victimhood is vastly over-stated.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
99. Apparently you don't see my point,
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:15 PM
Apr 2016

"victimhood" has nothing to do with it insofar as Bernie is concerned, this is about the people having the best information to make a well informed decision.

I knew Hillary's point of view before I posted this OP, but I don't believe she is playing it "cool."



Greenpeace Response to HRC: She Conflates Greenpeace w/ Sanders Campaign

WASHINGTON - Following the release of a video showing Secretary Hillary Clinton losing her patience with Greenpeace activist Eva Resnick-Day, the Clinton campaign released a statement saying that the campaign “has not taken a dollar from oil and gas industry PACs or corporations. The simple fact is that the Sanders campaign is misleading voters with their attacks.”

In response to Secretary Clinton’s statement, Greenpeace Democracy Campaign Director Molly Dorozenski issued the following response:

“Secretary Clinton cannot ignore the voices of activists asking her to reject fossil fuel money, or explain away the more than one million dollars she takes from fossil fuel lobbyists. We would welcome a statement from Clinton saying that she plans to stop taking this money going forward to prove to young people like Eva that she’s listening to them, not her biggest donors.”

“Secretary Clinton is conflating Greenpeace with the Sanders campaign, but we are an independent organization, and our research team has assessed the contributions to all Presidential candidates. We have not and will not endorse candidates. Earlier this year, we asked both Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders to sign our pledge to #fixdemocracy, and while Sanders signed, Clinton did not. We intend to continue to challenge all candidates to listen to the people, not their biggest donors.”




http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511624101

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
67. I assume you're speaking of the T.V. which is dominated by the six corporate media conglomerates
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:02 PM
Mar 2016

and requires vast sums of money to advertise on?

The same T.V. which blacked out Bernie for most all of last year, while at the same enabling/creating the Trump Monster?

The same national corporate media controlled T.V. which has totally gone silent in regards to the massive voter suppression which took place in Arizona?

None of the debates have been held in New York and we only got 8 after a major uproar from the people combined with Bernie pulling even or ahead in Iowa and New Hampshire, that's when Hillary and her pal Schultz became somewhat "enlightened."

The scheduling sucked as well, timed for when most people wouldn't be viewing them.

These would be the same corporate media conglomerates that directly benefit from Citizens United and unlimited sums of money pouring in from anywhere on the globe to corrupt our democratic process, I don't put much faith in them being honest brokers.

I believe the American People are much better served by head to head match-ups of the candidates in real time, this would especially hold true in a high media market such as New York and that's what Hillary is afraid of.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
94. Well, I don't watch TV. Never hooked it up.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:00 PM
Apr 2016

Perhaps I should have said, "they have access to the internet." Bernie has been well-exposed on the internet, as have the numerous slanders on Clinton.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
100. Well believe it or not millions if not tens in millions of Americans
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:21 PM
Apr 2016

still get their primary information from television for various reasons.

Television still has great propaganda power over the people although thanks to the Internet the times are changing.

While I have no doubt Hillary has her fair share of enemies, the majority of her wounds are self-inflicted.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
19. The last thing she wants is to be exposed in New York...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:36 PM
Mar 2016

The Carpetbagger has flipped and flopped and shaped shifted SO much, that she knows she should not be in front of cameras, in such a venue...Camp Weathervane can't control the situation to their liking.

And about those Wall Street transcripts?

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
24. Perhaps if Hillary doesn't want to debate, as one DU member mentioned, Bernie should start
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

negotiations with Trump for a New York debate.

I think Hillary would notice.

Sorry I can't remember who the DU member was or I would give them credit.

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
27. I have no doubt Bernie would kick Republican ass uptown and downtown.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:52 PM
Mar 2016

it would become a new hit show.






saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
32. Thank you for sharing the video.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:11 PM
Mar 2016

It was great fun to watch. First time I've seen the clips of Laurel and Hardy and Groucho practicing their dance moves.

TexasBushwhacker

(21,215 posts)
39. "Can't act. Slightly bald. Can dance a little.'
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:55 PM
Mar 2016

Casting director's notes on Fred Astaire's first screen test.

Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #27)

Eric J in MN

(35,639 posts)
49. Donald Trump agreed to debate Bernie Sanders but then Trump changed his mind.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:09 PM
Mar 2016

The Fox News town hall in which Bernie Sanders was on stage for the first half-hour and Hillary Clinton was on stage for the second half-hour was originally supposed to be a debate between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
33. Clinton is not "skittish" about having a debate in NY. She is winning by a...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:23 PM
Mar 2016

...comfortable margin, and has nothing to gain by engaging in another debate. Simple really. Interesting, your use of the word "skittish", btw...

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
38. Yes, Hillary is and she's trying to run out the clock.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:55 PM
Mar 2016

Interesting that you're splitting pubic hairs about the English Language trying to create every little division imaginable while ignoring the central point.

Debates aren't for the candidates, they're for the people and Hillary wants to deny this to the citizens of New York, because she is more concerned about her own political ambitions and fearful of potential loss than aiding a well informed electorate in making deliberations in regards to their choice for the highest office in the land.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
45. Gosh, Unc, you sure sound exercised with all your talk about pubic hairs and such.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:07 PM
Mar 2016

There is no clock for her to run out. The candidate who is ahead has made a tactical decision not to engage in a debate before NY. This isn't a basketball game. It is politics. Btw, what "little divisions" were you imagining?

Uncle Joe

(65,218 posts)
50. A self-serving "tactical decision" at the expense of a well informed electorate, what did you mean
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:11 PM
Mar 2016

by skittish being an "interesting choice of words?"

yourout

(8,837 posts)
40. Don't be so sure....I have heard it has closed significantly.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:00 PM
Mar 2016

If this was not a closed primary Hillary would be in trouble.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
48. She would only be in trouble if Bernie won the primary.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:08 PM
Mar 2016

So would be to Bernie's advantage to get a majority in a closed primary. If it were not closed, Bernie would need a large majority to start catching up.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,700 posts)
57. That's a good start
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:37 PM
Mar 2016

And its fascinating that what you get from it is something he never claimed. So you yourself realized that Bernie is NOT Clinton. Good spot! His position that the richest nation in the history of the world should be able to at least keep up with other democracies in regards to healthcare, education, and campaign finance, are truly NOT what the "no we can't" candidate is saying. Bravo.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
84. That sounds like projection, my friend
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:10 AM
Apr 2016

The only thing clinton has is "I'm not a Republican." And she's not real convincing about that.

Nitram

(27,821 posts)
96. Don't you get tired of those old lies about Clinton being a Republican in Democrat's clothing?
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

Or is it just lack of information on your part? Or worse, the only way you can think of to support your candidate?

colorado_ufo

(6,256 posts)
44. What's so funny, Madam Secretary? Just what, exactly, are you laughing at?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:06 PM
Mar 2016

It feels to me to be very condescending toward her audience.

Ino

(3,366 posts)
71. Followed by that sour expression...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:50 PM
Mar 2016

you might have thought a bird had landed on Sander's podium

Red Oak

(699 posts)
73. There is no way Hillary could stand up to that
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:21 PM
Mar 2016

She resents most of what he said and she represents most of what he said.

The choice of her would be too stark, too dramatic.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
77. Trickle-down Hillary finds the 1% quite acceptable. Just make your living stroking Wall Street
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:20 PM
Mar 2016

with speeches telling them how awesome they are.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»The reason that Hillary i...