![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
thomservo | Apr 2016 | OP |
onehandle | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
IHateTheGOP | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
thomservo | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
TIME TO PANIC | Apr 2016 | #8 | |
thomservo | Apr 2016 | #10 | |
TIME TO PANIC | Apr 2016 | #12 | |
liberalnarb | Apr 2016 | #9 | |
merrily | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
stonecutter357 | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
thomservo | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
IHateTheGOP | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
polly7 | Apr 2016 | #11 | |
TIME TO PANIC | Apr 2016 | #13 | |
polly7 | Apr 2016 | #14 | |
TIME TO PANIC | Apr 2016 | #15 |
Response to thomservo (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 10:05 AM
onehandle (51,122 posts)
1. IT'S A CONSPIRACY! nt
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
IHateTheGOP This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
thomservo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:12 AM
TIME TO PANIC (1,894 posts)
8. The purpose of claiming conspiracy theory is to discourage institutional analysis. Noam Chomsky n/t
Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #8)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:19 AM
thomservo (147 posts)
10. And where did I claim MSNBC conspired with anyone?
I think it's entirely possible they're simply promoting their own interests.
|
Response to thomservo (Reply #10)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:30 AM
TIME TO PANIC (1,894 posts)
12. Don't ask me; ask onehandle.
I have no idea what they're on about.
![]() |
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:18 AM
liberalnarb (4,532 posts)
9. No, just typical.
Response to thomservo (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 10:18 AM
merrily (45,251 posts)
2. MSNBC and others, like Shields and Shrum, began pushing Hillary before Obama was re-elected.
Response to thomservo (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 10:29 AM
stonecutter357 (12,383 posts)
3. when bernie fails to be elected it will be his fault no one else.
![]() |
Response to stonecutter357 (Reply #3)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 10:40 AM
thomservo (147 posts)
4. Who said anything about Bernie?
Response to thomservo (Original post)
IHateTheGOP This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to thomservo (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:24 AM
polly7 (20,582 posts)
11. Did she know of this?
If she did and had no objection, why was she up here giving speeches in 2015 to the two big banks pushing the Keystone XL?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/31/hillary-clinton-speeches-keystone_n_7463108.html |
Response to polly7 (Reply #11)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:50 AM
TIME TO PANIC (1,894 posts)
13. C'mon, that was a matter of months ago.
She's evolved.
![]() |
Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #13)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:53 AM
polly7 (20,582 posts)
14. I've just read so many posts stating she gave all those speeches not even considering
running for president yet, and that's why what she got paid millions and millions for and the secrecy of what's in them should be of no concern. Yet, here we see she was being pushed in 2014.
Some people need to consider their excuses/lies defending this pay-to-play shit a little more seriously .... they don't even make sense. The 'Yeah, you go girl!!! - making all that money in a man's world!' celebratory crap ..... ugh. I'm not sure who they think they're fooling, actually. OF COURSE she knew she was running. |
Response to polly7 (Reply #14)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 02:14 PM
TIME TO PANIC (1,894 posts)