Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumGeorge Takei: Vote blue no matter who
I absolutely love the way he speaks.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)but that was almost fifty years ago! He's just milking it now.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Civil right's activism was?
Interesting.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Just a jest. I actually hold him in very high esteem for his early activism, and would never seriously denigrate it.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Biaviians
(167 posts)Response to 840high (Reply #3)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Identity politics FAIL.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)George Takei was in an interment camp?
Your comment is a joke in very poor taste..
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)"Voting blue" meant voting for anti-Asian planks in the Democratic platform. (Anti-Asian sentiment was expressed by both parties, actually.) When the Japanese were interned, the White House and both houses of Congress were "blue."
Japanese Americans wouldn't have the chance to "vote blue" until 1952.
The internment was no more a military necessity than the threat of Saddam's WMD. What was a threat was the Japanese's skill in farming; wages for Japanese workers were creeping up on the wages for Caucasian workers.
Once the Japanese were interned, farm corporations struck a deal with the government to harvest the crops in the field; dummy corporations would be subsidized by the government to spare the farm corps from any risk. These dummy corporations would then sell back to the farm corporations at a very low price. Any other expenses encountered would be billed to the Japanese. (Farm corporations had liens against the crops, a consequence of the Japanese suffering decades of legislative hurdles to make their living expenses very costly.)
The congressional report, Personal Justice Denied, explained the internment as war-mongering racists gone wild, with a failure of everyone to stop them.
Oops! Our bad. These things happen.
No mention of the objective monetary incentives received by farm corporations (Financial loss to the Japanese was estimated to be between $800 million and $2 billion in 1983 dollars.)
Simply "voting blue" because they're "the good guys" is a joke in very poor taste.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)Which party wants internment camps? If you say democratic you're just a troll.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)If you can't say Democratic, you're just a liar.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)You're just like the idiots that say the democratic party "is" the party of the KKK.
Sorry time passes on, believe it or not it's no longer the 1940s
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)It wasn't about race, it was about economic exploitation. Race was the excuse given to the rubes who might not approve of an illegal and unconstitutional power grab by the government on behalf of big corporations.
We're all "Japanese" now.
BTW, when is Hillary going to release those transcripts of her Goldman Sachs speeches? I'd love to hear what promises she made in exchange for a quarter of a million dollars. If Hillary is elected President, can we expect her to follow in Obama's footsteps by failing to prosecute any big banks that engage in massive fraud?
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)Graduate from high school first.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)HOW WILL I EVER RECOVER?
You're boring. I'm done with you.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I will vote for the best candidate - period - and always!
Cary
(11,746 posts)It's a nice, glittering generality.
And it's code, isn't it?
brush
(53,776 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)brush
(53,776 posts)Bernie or Hillary in the general to stop Trump.
Cary
(11,746 posts)the man is an idiot. He is a narcissist. Anyone who would vote anything but blue has a screw loose somewhere.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
chknltl
(10,558 posts)chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)jhart3333
(332 posts)TrueDemVA
(250 posts)No more DINOs!
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Just remember that Kim Davis was a Democrat.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)At 39, it might be better to take my medicine now and look forward to 2020.
Wibly
(613 posts)If the Dems want people to vote Blue no matter Who, then they had better produce a nominee who is not tied into Goldman Sacs, does not have a history of foreign policy blunders (Iraq and Libya), does not have a history of flip flopping and pandering, and is actually a candidate people can get behind in a big way.
Sorry but, this argument that people should vote against their own principles and self interest just because there is a big scary Trump out there, does not wash.
Trump can be big and scary, but if he doesn't have Congress and the Senate behind him, he'll be mostly bluster.
No, I'm not saying I would vote Trump, but it doesn't mean I would vote Clinton.
McKim
(2,412 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)clinton is not going to fight for all those things. Please get involved and lend your name to building a permanent structure for the Sanders issues .