Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EarlG

(21,942 posts)
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:51 PM May 2016

Pic Of The Moment: How Trump Compares To Previous GOP Candidates Among Crucial Voting Blocs



How groups voted in 2004

How groups voted in 2008

How groups voted in 2012

Trump, Hispanic voters 11%

Trump, African-American voters <10%

Trump, women voters 31%

Trump, young voters 25%




29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pic Of The Moment: How Trump Compares To Previous GOP Candidates Among Crucial Voting Blocs (Original Post) EarlG May 2016 OP
Are the numbers for "The Hispanics" pre- or post- Taco Bowl? underpants May 2016 #1
I LOVE the pictures you find for these EarlG! hibbing May 2016 #2
Bush didn't win in 2004, fasttense May 2016 #3
+1 Botany May 2016 #4
2004 Presidential Election Results, the Exit Polls vs. the Vote Counts L. Coyote May 2016 #12
+1 nt Herman4747 May 2016 #5
Actually, Ohio 2004 was punch cards, and they were switched, not hacked. L. Coyote May 2016 #11
Actually it was a vote shift but it's not the point fasttense May 2016 #16
That's a complete ruse to cover up stealing Ohio for a decade. L. Coyote May 2016 #18
Ohio was solid blue before the right-wingers introduced the punch card system for stealing black vot Botany May 2016 #27
He didn't win 2000, either... KansDem May 2016 #15
I never knew this. (About 2004 that is, 2000 was blatantly obvious) liberalnarb May 2016 #20
airplane 'accidents' have been a very effective certainot May 2016 #25
I'm surprised Trump is getting 11% NewJeffCT May 2016 #6
What I don't understand... liberal N proud May 2016 #7
I was thinking the same thing PatSeg May 2016 #17
How did Bush do so well with Hispanics? oberliner May 2016 #8
He courted them heavily and spoke Spanish ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #9
My how things have changed oberliner May 2016 #13
Yes, I believe so NewJeffCT May 2016 #21
LOL ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #10
Republicans always have that demographic locked up.. nt Doctor Jack May 2016 #14
hahaha oldandhappy May 2016 #19
Most polls NewJeffCT May 2016 #22
I meant the repub gang of candidates. oldandhappy May 2016 #23
easy explanation on Trump's success NewJeffCT May 2016 #24
Exactly what I've been trying to point out Turin_C3PO May 2016 #26
It isn't favorable for him at all Cosmocat May 2016 #29
What's wrong with 31% of American women? nt stage left May 2016 #28

underpants

(182,736 posts)
1. Are the numbers for "The Hispanics" pre- or post- Taco Bowl?
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:00 PM
May 2016

BTW I read the < as a negative at first.

hibbing

(10,095 posts)
2. I LOVE the pictures you find for these EarlG!
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:00 PM
May 2016

Hahah McGrumpy looks like he's taking poo in his pants. Romney looks like he's watching his election results, Trump, well yeah. And the war criminal looks like he's thinking about a peanut butter sandwich his mommy made for him.


Peace

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
3. Bush didn't win in 2004,
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:00 PM
May 2016

He stole it by hacking the Ohio vote count. The guy who could prove it mysteriously died in an airplane "accident" after having written a letter stating that if he died look into Rove. No one has ever investigated the timely murder err... death.

W never, ever won in a fair federal election. But hay this is what being a RepubliCON is all about. The long CON.

Botany

(70,483 posts)
4. +1
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

"He stole it by hacking the Ohio vote count." I know I was there.

In 2004 nationwide all exit polls in states that had paper ballots the exit polls matched the
vote count w/a slight shift to Kerry that was < the M.O.E. (margin of error)

In 2004 nationwide all states that used electronic voting machines the exit polls did not match
vote count and their was a shift to w bush that was > the M.O.E.

The democratic party and our liberal media all know these facts and will not say shit.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
12. 2004 Presidential Election Results, the Exit Polls vs. the Vote Counts
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:40 PM
May 2016
2004 Presidential Election Results, the Exit Polls vs. the Vote Counts

15 States with % Disparity favoring Bush and StDev > 1.0
Disparity Range 3.03% - 4.83%
Mean Disparity = 3.65%
Mean Kerry Votes Reported = 48.37 %
Mean Kerry Exit Polls = 52.02%
33,982,586 voters

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
11. Actually, Ohio 2004 was punch cards, and they were switched, not hacked.
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

Before they were counted.

How Kerry Votes Were Switched To Bush Votes

Switching to e-voting removes the evidence that was obvious with punch card voting. HAVA was more like a Help Republican Cheats Act.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
16. Actually it was a vote shift but it's not the point
Mon May 9, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

"The filing also includes the revealing deposition of the late Michael Connell. Connell served as the IT guru for the Bush family and Karl Rove. Connell ran the private IT firm GovTech that created the controversial system that transferred Ohio's vote count late on election night 2004 to a partisan Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee owned by SmarTech. That is when the vote shift happened, not predicted by the exit polls, that led to Bush's unexpected victory. Connell died a month and a half after giving this deposition in a suspicious small plane crash." http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2319:new-court-filing-reveals-how-the-2004-ohio-presidential-election-was-hacked

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
18. That's a complete ruse to cover up stealing Ohio for a decade.
Mon May 9, 2016, 02:47 PM
May 2016

The counties knew their vote tallies before reporting them, and after the election the counties did their final, official counts and reported those. If one vote was changed, they would know because they know how to read numbers! There was no vote shift between the county totals and the totals that went online.

Ohio was solid blue before the right-wingers introduced the punch card system for stealing black votes. That's what they don't want you to know.

Botany

(70,483 posts)
27. Ohio was solid blue before the right-wingers introduced the punch card system for stealing black vot
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:36 PM
May 2016

Now would that be w/George Voinovich, Gov. Taft,
Gov. Rhodes, or Gov. O'Neil?

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
20. I never knew this. (About 2004 that is, 2000 was blatantly obvious)
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:37 PM
May 2016

I always thought that w won in 2004 only because he used 9/11 as a fear mongering tool.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
7. What I don't understand...
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:23 PM
May 2016

is the 11% Hispanics, the 10% African Americans and the 31% Women.

Are these people insane?

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
9. He courted them heavily and spoke Spanish
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:34 PM
May 2016

Remember, he was open to immigration reform, which actually got him into heat with the party.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
21. Yes, I believe so
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:53 PM
May 2016

I'm guessing we'll see a surge in the Hispanic turnout so people can vote against Trump. Then, if somebody like Julian Castro is on the ticket as well, we could be talking about Trump getting less than 5% of the Hispanic vote.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
19. hahaha
Mon May 9, 2016, 02:56 PM
May 2016

Pretty clear we need shrub to make a come back. Is the two term thing total or just consecutive?
It is weird to me that with Trump down in all categories, why is he ahead in the vote?

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
22. Most polls
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:54 PM
May 2016

Have Trump behind Clinton by double digits, or close to double digits. And, the electoral math is bad for him as well

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
23. I meant the repub gang of candidates.
Mon May 9, 2016, 04:02 PM
May 2016

He did came out on top of the 17. Crazy to me, but it happened.

Yea, he seems to be way behind clinton now. We have not had the conventions and we are running the GE!!! The primary season is too long.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
24. easy explanation on Trump's success
Mon May 9, 2016, 04:24 PM
May 2016

The GOP is a lot whiter, a lot angrier and a lot older than the rest of the electorate. And, those are the people that turn out to vote in the primaries. (in solidly blue states like NY, Mass and CT, only moderate Republicans tend to have any success - yet, Trump won in landslides in all 3 states because the moderates don't vote as heavily in the primaries.)

The evangelical vote was split early between Cruz, Carson, Huckabee and Santorum, so they never had a chance once Trump did well early.

The mainstream GOP was too busy watching Jeb Bush crash & burn and hoping he could right himself before moving on too late to lightweight Rubio and then Kasich. So, they watched as Rubio and then Kasich went down in flames as well.

Rand Paul couldn't generate enough of the racist vote after Trump won their love with his comments about Mexicans and Muslims.

Turin_C3PO

(13,952 posts)
26. Exactly what I've been trying to point out
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:48 PM
May 2016

to doom sayers; that the demographics simply don't add up for Trump.

Cosmocat

(14,561 posts)
29. It isn't favorable for him at all
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:32 AM
May 2016

But, the demographics don't move the needle as much in some key states - Pa, Oh in particular.

I am fairly confident he is going to be himself, come off as a complete ass and make Hillary look better, and even sympathetic at times.

But, he has a legitimate path if he can hold the core R states and win Oh and Pa, where the Hispanic vote in particular is not heavy.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pic Of The Moment: How Tr...