Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC admits: "We'll SUPPRESS VOTING to help CLINTON on June 7th" | Bernie Sanders (Original Post) leftcoastmountains May 2016 OP
They just can't let go of their power. When the corporate power structure is threatened... Ned_Devine May 2016 #1
This post is complete BS Hokie May 2016 #2
They certainly did admit something of the sort. MNBrewer May 2016 #5
They pretty much suppress the news at will. Nirgendwo May 2016 #6
+1 Brother Joe Observes May 2016 #12
rec'd and thanks leftcoastmountains saidsimplesimon May 2016 #3
Chris Matthews is such an asshole. Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #4
Yes, he is. Enthusiast May 2016 #9
Do not watch. Do not give them power over you. oldandhappy May 2016 #7
well at least Chris is giving us a heads up of dirty tricks to come...... bbgrunt May 2016 #8
Yes, yes he is! Duppers May 2016 #10
They are trying that in California. They keep repeating the Hillary is the winner in hopes JDPriestly May 2016 #22
I hope it does backfire. Duppers May 2016 #23
I believe they did this in Arizona when there were thousands of people standing in lines. Enthusiast May 2016 #11
Reporting NJ voting doesn't suppress CA results anymore than reporting any other pnwmom May 2016 #13
Which is why shadowmayor May 2016 #14
K&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #15
It is the Superdelegates 86derps May 2016 #16
We need to make clear to them we are noting their actions Duckfan May 2016 #17
Which video did you watch? This one bears no relation to the OP. L. Coyote May 2016 #18
Gore had the right idea when he created an 'independent' network (called Current) Lodestar May 2016 #19
Current was a good effort by Gore and I was sorry to see it go. For us appalachiablue May 2016 #27
Tweety Pie won't be whistling Dixie if... ReRe May 2016 #20
Chris Matthews is a fucking tool... also doesn't he have a huge conflict of interest with Hillary? Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #24
Chris was off for 'family business' MSNBC said the night of the MD primary appalachiablue May 2016 #25
yes, apparently. Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #28
Tweety ain't nothing if not a ReRe May 2016 #30
LOL. What happens when WE decide the race. as we have for the last year? Will that have any effect? mhatrw May 2016 #21
That's not what he said. But Hillary will be the nominee - that is a fact. Lil Missy May 2016 #26
Proof... Stellar May 2016 #29
This belongs in GDP with all the other bullshit. Squinch May 2016 #31
 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
1. They just can't let go of their power. When the corporate power structure is threatened...
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:00 PM
May 2016

...these are the types of things that happen. WE'RE ALL WATCHING AND DOCUMENTING THIS!!

Hokie

(4,286 posts)
2. This post is complete BS
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:15 PM
May 2016

MSNBC admitted nothing of the sort. I suppose what you are proposing is suppressing the news to help Sanders then.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
5. They certainly did admit something of the sort.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:28 PM
May 2016

Paraphrase. "We're going to announce that Hillary Clinton is the nominee before polls close in California. Will it suppress Clinton's vote or Sander's vote more?"

 
12. +1
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:15 AM
May 2016

They're talking about time zones, and whether NJ results should be divulged before CA stops voting. In the Internet Age, it's an entirely moot point.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
3. rec'd and thanks leftcoastmountains
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:28 PM
May 2016

I've not seen any admission from the MSNBC networks executive office of bias. It is obvious if you tune in to Chris Matthews or Rachael Maddow that they do favor Mrs. Clinton, imo.

Duppers

(28,117 posts)
10. Yes, yes he is!
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:14 AM
May 2016

To announce Hillary as the winner before the polls close is just WRONG and will indeed skew the vote.

What an admission!




JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
22. They are trying that in California. They keep repeating the Hillary is the winner in hopes
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:53 AM
May 2016

that Californians won't vote for Bernie.

I think it might be backfiring. We Californians are a feisty bunch.

pnwmom

(108,959 posts)
13. Reporting NJ voting doesn't suppress CA results anymore than reporting any other
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:22 AM
May 2016

earlier contests. This is complete nonsense.

shadowmayor

(1,325 posts)
14. Which is why
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:30 AM
May 2016

All voting should be done on paper ballots. Most precincts in the USA have a little over 1000 voters. Let the good people at the polls count the votes over night and release the results the following morning. Counting a few thousand ballots will take some number of hours and we can all go to bed knowing that we've done our minor duty by voting. This rush to "break the news" is just more Madison Avenue crap to get us to buy cars, pills, beverages, and more pills for the pills that don't work.

Hand counted ballots. No results until sunup the next day. And Tweety and the rest of the fawning corporate media can sit on a chainsaw until the results are announced.

 

86derps

(44 posts)
16. It is the Superdelegates
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:41 AM
May 2016

Suppressing the vote is announcing that Clinton has won enough delegates by counting superdelegates on June 7th when they do not vote until the convention.

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
17. We need to make clear to them we are noting their actions
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:52 AM
May 2016

I don't have FB but if I did, I would make these a-holes aware of the backlash that may occur. Remember, there are over 10 million of us. I'm not sure how else to say it diplomatically when MSBS pisses you off.

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
19. Gore had the right idea when he created an 'independent' network (called Current)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:06 AM
May 2016

and even though it wasn't a success, this may eventually be how to counteract
the biased crap on the major networks. Not like what FOX did, which essentially
served a political party, but more like the model used by the independent film movement
that was a reaction to the major hollywood studio cartel.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
27. Current was a good effort by Gore and I was sorry to see it go. For us
Wed May 25, 2016, 09:46 AM
May 2016

Free Speech TV on Dish has been a great provider of programs like Amy Goodman's Democracy Now!, the daytime Thom Hartman Program, Ring of Fire with Mike Papantonio, France 24, David Pakman, the Laura Flanders Show, Bioneers and others along with progressive documentaries they carry on the environment, politics, labor, world affairs and more.

So many on the left are getting their info. from the independent New Media online, rather than the declining 5 corporate owned monopoly television networks- from the Young Turks/TYT and alternative print news websites Truthout, Common Dreams, the Intercept, Truthdig and more as you probably know. Ed Schultz' nightly News program and The Big Picture with TH, M-F evenings, broadcast by RT (Russia Today) on Dish TV or online livestream are also very good sources. Eventually Net neutrality will be challenged and pressure to charge fees for the internet will happen, it's only a matter of time I think although I hope I'm wrong.

In the last 20 years Fox TV and RW Hate Radio with 1,200 channels have done tremendous damage no doubt about it. The contracts which 90 US colleges and universities have for sports team coverage with Limbaugh also contaminate young minds with ultraconservative lies and garbage which is deplorable.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
20. Tweety Pie won't be whistling Dixie if...
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:01 AM
May 2016

... Bernie indeed turns that state upside down on June 7th. He'll be eating crow. If it happens (and I think it can), the reaction on all of their faces will be priceless. If Bernie does it, try to stay a bit composed so you can hear their reactions.

Bernie needs to run those ads! "California Dreamin"

And we supporters need to support him till the end.

This one is real easy:

https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/duforbernie

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
24. Chris Matthews is a fucking tool... also doesn't he have a huge conflict of interest with Hillary?
Wed May 25, 2016, 07:38 AM
May 2016

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
25. Chris was off for 'family business' MSNBC said the night of the MD primary
Wed May 25, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

Last edited Wed May 25, 2016, 09:57 AM - Edit history (1)

when wife Kathleen came in third in the congressional election won by left MD State Senator and Amer. Univ. constitutional law prof Jamie Raskin. The network didn't say much about that race. She received campaign funds from Clinton connections, employees of Marriot where she was an exec and others according to the reports. It didn't help apparently.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
30. Tweety ain't nothing if not a
Wed May 25, 2016, 03:41 PM
May 2016

"huge conflict of interest." I don't watch him much anymore, except for entertainment. If M$M even knew what a laughing stock it is these days.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
26. That's not what he said. But Hillary will be the nominee - that is a fact.
Wed May 25, 2016, 09:17 AM
May 2016

It IS over. The only bullshit (lying!) is coming from Jeff Weaver.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»MSNBC admits: "We'll SUPP...