Michigan Electors Should Not Be Allowed To Vote...

[thomhartmann]

[turbinetree]

1. K& R-------------------------for this Thom Hartmann

[MichMary]

2. Even without Michigan

Trump still wins with 290 electoral votes.

[Skittles]

5. yes we know

repukes win suppressing the vote - heaven forbid they win for their shitty policies

[The Wielding Truth]

3. If the state's voting system cannot be relied on for recount then it is bogus and should not count

at all.

That is just logic and fairness.Credibility of any system must be able to be checked.

[oley]

9. If the state's voting system cannot be relied on for recount then it is bogus and should not count

I agree

[The Wielding Truth]

12. Welcome to DU. A democracy can't work without each of us having a legit vote.

[Farmgirl1961]

4. And how many other states have similar problems to Michigan???

[Skittles]

6. ALL OF THEM

repukes win elections with vote supression (and gerrymandering for other elections)

[Farmgirl1961]

10. Yup...

I say - let's redo this entire fiasco of an election!

[Baitball Blogger]

7. True. If the state can't assure a fair election they should be prevented from influencing the

national results

[Iamaartist]

8. Michigan Electors ......K&R

Hi Tom
I agree 100% with you they should not be aloud to,,,,keep up the good work on your radio show we seen you yrs ago in GR I live in Michigan and was born in GR .....also

[tomp]

11. not sure i understand.

if a spoiled ballot can't be explained then you cannot have a recount? that sounds totally ass backwards. i would think that would be a perfect reason for a hand recount. sounds like the law was specifically designed to avoid recounting under exactly this scenario, which implies foreknowledge of disproportionate spoiling of votes. and how can an explanation of a spoiled ballot occur if it can't be recounted, i.e., reexamined? am i missing something?

it would be interesting to see how and when this law was passed.