Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
what's your opinion? (Original Post) wincest Jul 2017 OP
Appears that it is simply an outlet for information. MedusaX Jul 2017 #1
thank you for wincest Jul 2017 #2
Here's a rather detailed review of what this guy and his show are about: Rhiannon12866 Jul 2017 #3

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
1. Appears that it is simply an outlet for information.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 01:25 PM
Jul 2017

In today's society, IMO, few people desire to gather information from those who represent positions which differ from their own.
As such, the trend has been to label all information outlets according to the political position the outlet promotes. This 'label' has amazing power.

The label serves as a reassurance ... that only friendly information will be presented... for those who fear what might happen if they accidentally heard information contrary to their personal beliefs.

A label also seems to be a badge of honor/dishonor ... given to outlets which dare to provide information that is or is not, as perceived by any given person or group, 100% pure to a position...

People also align themselves with information outlets whose labels match how they want to be perceived by others... {as if limiting oneself to a single information outlet/source is something to be proud of}

The label is also a weapon...
for example:
By publicly promoting an outlet as being 'far-right' in a forum which leans 'left'... one can prevent many in the forum from ever accessing or believing any information offered by the outlet.
With
The goal being to discredit a source that offers information that one's opposition might benefit from.


IOW, Rather than constantly analyzing and evaluating information from a wide variety of outlets/sources and possibly adjusting one's position based on new conclusions drawn,
lots of people prefer to permanently align themselves with a movement/position to such a degree that they have zero desire to consider / interact with information even remotely contrary to their beliefs.....

FWIW

Rhiannon12866

(206,431 posts)
3. Here's a rather detailed review of what this guy and his show are about:
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 07:53 AM
Jul 2017


Dave Rubin is one of the rising media stars of one of the craziest years in American political history. In a time when the political conversation is especially polarized and personality-obsessed, and when Americans of all ideological stripes are puzzled as to where the last year of Trump or Sanders-driven political lunacy leaves them, the comedian and talk-show host—a 39-year-old pro-choice, pro-pot, recently gay-married atheist with a strong allergy to organized religion—may come closer than political partisans of either party to reflecting the national mood of befuddlement: Is this moment horrifyingly real, or a sick joke, or an as-yet undefinable mixture of both? As host of The Rubin Report, a long-form online interview show with over 216,000 YouTube subscribers and 67 million total views, Rubin keeps up a front of cool equanimity, no matter how fraught or absurd the conversations get.

Much more: http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/205205/liberals-mugged-by-progressives
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»what's your opinion?