Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2895 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Cannot Have a President Under Investigation (Original Post)
tomhagen
Aug 2017
OP
What we can't have, is a president who's a Russian (or any other power's) asset.
sandensea
Aug 2017
#2
Gothmog
(145,126 posts)1. Yeah for Keith
sandensea
(21,622 posts)2. What we can't have, is a president who's a Russian (or any other power's) asset.
Isn't that one of the main reasons we established a 17-agency strong intelligence behemoth? To make sure no foreign power came to somehow control our government?
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)3. whoops... too late.
yeah he has to go.
longship
(40,416 posts)4. Ain't I a stinker?
Yup! You are, Keith. That's why, like Bugs, you are the best of the best.
Just watch out for that left at Albuquerque.