Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumglobal1
(26,507 posts)there's power in numbers. The NRA couldn't afford to take them all on at the same time. They would need to stick together and be unwavering against the NRA. The NRA wouldn't be able to handle that.
OnDoutside
(20,868 posts)Loyd
(309 posts)3:57 in
global1
(26,507 posts)there's power in numbers. The NRA couldn't afford to take them all on at the same time. They would need to stick together and be unwavering against the NRA. The NRA wouldn't be able to handle that.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)There are even Democrats who think someone with 40+ lethal weapons like Paddock is OK until he shoots 400+ people. Then they start saying nothing should be done, and these mass murders and daily deaths of innocent people are just the price we must pay for them to have access to more guns -- Freedum or some such BS.
billh58
(6,655 posts)who defend the NRA, arms dealers, weapons manufacturers, and gun hoarders before, during, and after each horrific mass shooting event. Second Amendment absolutists and right-wing gun lobby apologists enable the gun violence epidemic.
benld74
(10,285 posts)RainCaster
(13,717 posts)So how do you feel about that? Then get mad. Get pissed and get busy. Do something about it.NJ
trof
(54,274 posts)Hmmm...cant reach this page
Try this
randr
(12,648 posts)They are only looking for the anti NRA group to send them more money than the NRA already does.