A very Blunt Ad- vote for the Candidate without a Penis

6 replies, 1212 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

6 replies	Author	Time	Post
A very Blunt Ad- vote for the Candidate without a Penis (Original post)	tomhagen	Dec 2017	OP
So having a penis or not having a penis is the single most important issue in this race?	marble falls	Dec 2017	#1
that's not the only case she is making.	CTyankee	Dec 2017	#4
With the tenor of the times, I am much more likely to vote for a woman than a white male ....	marble falls	Dec 2017	#5
I think it goes to the issue of basic decency. Most of the cases involving sexual	CTyankee	Dec 2017	#6
Sexist. Not helpful.	Sneederbunk	Dec 2017	#2
I like this ad. Yes, she does "go there" on sexual harassment, but	CTyankee	Dec 2017	#3

Response to tomhagen (Original post)

Fri Dec 1, 2017, 03:51 PM

marble falls (35,877 posts)

1. So having a penis or not having a penis is the single most important issue in this race?

Reply to this post

Response to marble falls (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 11:15 AM

CTyankee (58,018 posts)

4. that's not the only case she is making.

She makes the case based on her qualifications. Sad that we all have to deal with the issue of sexual predation, but we do...

Reply to this post

Response to CTyankee (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:05 PM

marble falls (35,877 posts)

5. With the tenor of the times, I am much more likely to vote for a woman than a white male ....

all other things being equal, sex assault just being one of the issues I am paying very close attention to. But it is not the only or driving issue.

Reply to this post

Response to marble falls (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 02:31 PM

CTyankee (58,018 posts)

6. I think it goes to the issue of basic decency. Most of the cases involving sexual

predation of women involve republicans, with the exception of Franken and Weiner. So right there you have Democratic values and issues that we agree on as Democrats.

So far, our Dem senators, Murphy and Blumenthal, have been stellar and Murphy may be considering a presidential run at some point which is exciting to me.

Reply to this post

Response to tomhagen (Original post)

Fri Dec 1, 2017, 04:07 PM

Sneederbunk (8,092 posts)

2. Sexist. Not helpful.

Reply to this post

Response to tomhagen (Original post)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 11:05 AM

CTyankee (58,018 posts)

3. I like this ad. Yes, she does "go there" on sexual harassment, but

she also lays out a good, strong case for her candidacy.

At this point, we have to deal with sexual harassment in the workplace. It is sad that we do, I agree, but women didn't pull this down on themselves. The workplace must change.

The other point she makes about having three women run for top spots in state government is important. If it were three men, no problem. But three women? That's sexist.

Reply to this post

Video & Multimedia (Forum)