Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
tomhagen | Mar 2018 | OP |
YessirAtsaFact | Mar 2018 | #1 | |
TranssexualKaren | Mar 2018 | #2 | |
YessirAtsaFact | Mar 2018 | #3 | |
TranssexualKaren | Mar 2018 | #4 | |
ffr | Mar 2018 | #5 | |
thesquanderer | Mar 2018 | #7 | |
lapfog_1 | Mar 2018 | #6 | |
blue-wave | Mar 2018 | #8 |
Response to tomhagen (Original post)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 02:20 PM
YessirAtsaFact (2,049 posts)
1. This would be more relevant if they were in the House
And there were 25 of them
|
Response to YessirAtsaFact (Reply #1)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 02:41 PM
TranssexualKaren (364 posts)
2. What if....
Trump attempts to deal with the issue by going after Rosenstein instead of Mueller, Rosenstein’s replacement tries to halt the investigation and Mueller refuses and dares them to fire him instead?
Let me know what you think? |
Response to TranssexualKaren (Reply #2)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 02:56 PM
YessirAtsaFact (2,049 posts)
3. I think there are already dozens of reasons to impeach Trump for Obstruction of Justice
The repugnant goons haven’t moved to impeach him yet.
Trump won’t be impeached unless we take control of the house. The only exception is if Mueller has so much evidence of collusion that the nation is completely outraged and the pugs put country ahead of party. |
Response to YessirAtsaFact (Reply #3)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 03:26 PM
TranssexualKaren (364 posts)
4. Yes, but....
Firing Mueller seams to be a line they won’t cross. Of course, if Trump concludes his survival requires it he probibly will, but I thought that would make interesting thought experiment.
|
Response to YessirAtsaFact (Reply #1)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 04:45 PM
ffr (19,901 posts)
5. This
Ryan wouldn't allow it. Not on his watch. The people would have to storm the chambers in order for him to move on impeaching a conservative.
|
Response to YessirAtsaFact (Reply #1)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 06:35 PM
thesquanderer (10,861 posts)
7. Having Republican Senators supporting this is more important than having House members.
There's a good chance he Dems will take the House in the midterms, and Mueller won't complete his work before then, so then impeachment proceedings can happen. But it's all for naught if he s acquitted in the Senate, which is far less likely to flip, so that's the place we really need Republican allies.
|
Response to tomhagen (Original post)
Wed Mar 21, 2018, 04:58 PM
lapfog_1 (25,036 posts)
6. need 14 more senators AFTER Dems take the House in January
Response to tomhagen (Original post)
Thu Mar 22, 2018, 01:43 AM
blue-wave (2,104 posts)
8. Awww, the poor babies
one of the show's guests says republicons are terrified of the midterms in November. I feel so bad for them....never!!!
The talk of impeachment really has me feeling that that is not good enough. There has been too much......too much crap thrown at America. The whole damn republicon party needs to go down. They say the fish rots from the head, well this fish (their whole party) has completely rotted with only a teensy weensy bit of oily scale left. Vote 'em all out, every last one of them. |