Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(205,184 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 05:15 AM Nov 2018

Stephen Colbert - Guest Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand: Trump's AG Appointment Is Unconstitutional



'Bold and Brave' author and New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand weighs in on the constitutionality of the President's appointment of Matthew Whitaker, the new Acting Attorney General now overseeing Mueller's investigation.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stephen Colbert - Guest Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand: Trump's AG Appointment Is Unconstitutional (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Nov 2018 OP
So will she be challenging the appointment in the courts? n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2018 #1
I guess we'll see, but she's pretty proactive Rhiannon12866 Nov 2018 #2
It seems like, if it's unconstitutional, there should be a legal challenge, but... thesquanderer Nov 2018 #3
Yes, the way courts typically deal with situations like this is through the issue of "standing". PoliticAverse Nov 2018 #5
Laurence Tribe says any senator has standing to challenge Whitaker's appointment Danascot Nov 2018 #4

Rhiannon12866

(205,184 posts)
2. I guess we'll see, but she's pretty proactive
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 05:21 AM
Nov 2018

I know how many DUers feel and I can't help but agree, but she was also my congresswoman and did a great job for the district and has been very good for the state - and she also is known for voting against confirmation of Trump's appointments.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
3. It seems like, if it's unconstitutional, there should be a legal challenge, but...
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 10:12 AM
Nov 2018

...from my admittedly layman's understanding of the law, I think the issue may be that there is no mechanism to bring a case simply on the basis of something being unconstitutional. I think there first has to be some damage done, someone who has been hurt as a result, yielding a person/entity who then has standing to sue.

Maybe Rosenstein could sue, on the basis that he was legally entitled to the position...?

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
5. Yes, the way courts typically deal with situations like this is through the issue of "standing".
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 04:37 PM
Nov 2018

If you have "standing" (that is if the court thinks the issue effects you enough in a legal sense) you can bring a case.
The appointment of an Attorney General would normally require "advice and consent" of the Senate and so presumaby
a senator could sue or, as you mention, someone affected like Rosenstein.

See: https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/standing

Danascot

(4,690 posts)
4. Laurence Tribe says any senator has standing to challenge Whitaker's appointment
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 12:06 PM
Nov 2018

So Kirsten, stop talking and do something.




Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Stephen Colbert - Guest S...