Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumJHan
(10,173 posts)I hope she knows this.
still_one
(92,061 posts)womens rights, gun policy, taxes, foreign policy..... all above 65%
Right or wrong climate change ranks about 50%
Healthcare, the economy, and immigration, 80%
JHan
(10,173 posts)to ignore what was behind the decision to allow employees at fossil fuel companies donate to the party.
People need to know better if they're serious about solving problems and not just grandstanding.
still_one
(92,061 posts)most concerning to the American populace, not the most important issue to the green party
and of course we need bring back the environmental changes that President Obama implemented, that the draconian emperor took away, and abide by the Paris accords
JHan
(10,173 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)the subsidies and no pre-existing conditions that trump and the republicans took away
Does anyone even bother to listen to what people said was the most important issue?
JHan
(10,173 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)issue for Americans " is healthcare, and it came out media with the auto-correct.
Anyway, healthcare Healthcare, the economy, and immigration were the top three from the polling done. It isn't my opinion
JHan
(10,173 posts)they don't care about details
still_one
(92,061 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)I am just tired hearing the DNC talking point re donations.
I've no problem with activism like this either, but I hope they don't get it twisted - Dems are the only ones trying to make climate change a serious agenda.
still_one
(92,061 posts)want to schedule a meeting with Nancy Pelosi because... .
JHan
(10,173 posts)Optics wise it's a hairball.
I'll just say this wasn't the best way to handle it.
And youth is no excuse.
I'll lean on Nancy's take of the whole thing.
still_one
(92,061 posts)of fossil fuels and other elements contributing to climate change
What I find interesting, and this isn't directed at Cortez, but a lot of these protests seem to be directed at the wrong people
I really have to wonder if these protesters even are aware where Pelosi stands on these issues, because they are protesting someone who essentially agrees with them.
It is insane
JHan
(10,173 posts)I'd rather them be making McConnell's life a hell at his office. Of all offices I'd be at today, Pelosi's wouldn't be the one...That's strange to me, but whatevs. Their right I guess.
still_one
(92,061 posts)is aware I believe that cannot be realistically done unilaterally without cutting your nose off to spite your face.
You have to get rid of PACs in our political system until that is feasible
JHan
(10,173 posts)Matter of fact I think they know but politically they don't care to discuss the details behind it .
still_one
(92,061 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)my first order of business as a legislator would be to craft law to make green jobs feasible in my district.
assess closely the link with infrastructure, improving costs, and work on devising some econ plan tied to green jobs. That's the first thing I would be doing.
The job of a legislator is to craft bills. She should get a quick start on it, one sure way to show your colleagues and more importantly your constituents that you're not on games is to show strong intent to be useful and get shit done.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)I'm a Pelosi supporter 100%. Yes, she is a career politician, and she is able to relate to the youth and the real problems of today, but the mantel is going to have to be passed along to someone who is knowledgeable and efficient, as Nancy Pelosi has been.
I want to scream when I hear Democratic congressmen and women bashing Pelosi. She's done more for health care than ANY other congressperson, past or present. Without her muscle and hard work, we NEVER would have gotten it through. It's only a part of what it needs to be, but it was a foothold, and now the public have realized they are NOT willing to let it slip away.
So, protest if you must, but I agree that protesting in front of mcTurtlehead's office makes a hell of alot more sense than making it look like you are protesting Pelosi. Quit shooting ourselves in the foot!
JHan
(10,173 posts)And I say this as someone who wants the mantle passed, I am all for new blood...
The people who want her removed don't actually want to do the hard work to remove her, they want her to remove herself, they want her to perform weakness, they want her to admit that she is unworthy to be speaker. Yes they want her gone, but they want her to amputate herself.
Note the arguments "It's time for her to go" Notably absent from these fucking jokers is any discussion on how to persuade their colleagues to not support her. Very little discussion about changing epople's minds of challenging her in a fair fight and winning it. In other words, what is their strategy? Why has their strategy failed? It's not just down to Nancy. They have failed to make their case and they want her to pay for them failing to make their case.
And I am told that these are the sorts of people I should have confidence in to run Democrats in the House.
As for progressives pushing this, knowing who is behind the anti-pelosi attacks, makes me realise some progressives have no fucking clue what the hell they want.
JHan
(10,173 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)Hope she like her seat on the House select committee on toilet paper.
brush
(53,743 posts)Autumn
(44,986 posts)The rest of the video is the best interview I have ever heard a politician give. Fuck all her detractors.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)There is nothing in that video to disagree with, other than her unwillingness to get in line.
Autumn
(44,986 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)Are they even aware where Pelosi stands on these issues:
Voted NO on opening Outer Continental Shelf to oil drilling. (May 2011)
Voted NO on barring EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. (Apr 2011)
Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)
Voted YES on tax incentives for energy production and conservation. (May 2008)
Voted YES on tax incentives for renewable energy. (Feb 2008)
Voted YES on investing in homegrown biofuel. (Aug 2007)
Voted YES on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on scheduling permitting for new oil refinieries. (Jun 2006)
Voted NO on authorizing construction of new oil refineries. (Oct 2005)
Voted NO on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy. (Jun 2004)
Voted NO on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy. (Nov 2003)
Voted YES on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001)
Voted YES on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR. (Aug 2001)
Voted YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol. (Jun 2000)
Regulate wholesale electricity & gas prices. (Mar 2001)
Preserve Alaska's ANWR instead of drilling it. (Feb 2001)
Rated 100% by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence. (Dec 2006)
50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)
Autumn
(44,986 posts)People should try listening to what they are saying instead of whining that they are disrespecting others when they aren't.
still_one
(92,061 posts)be protesting Perez. Cortez is savey to know that it makes no sense unless such PAC contributions are blocked for all of Congress, DNC and RNC.
Autumn
(44,986 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)Right or wrong, that is the political reality
The amount of money spent on political advertisements through PACS was obscene. The networks made a bundle
Autumn
(44,986 posts)Yay team! It's not like climate change is an important or pressing issue.
In the words of the esteemed Shrub... Who cares we'll all be dead.
Quixote1818
(28,921 posts)Journeyman
(15,026 posts)Let us hope the media gives her sufficient coverage.
ProfessorGAC
(64,877 posts)You know, drain the swamp and all that rubbish.
I just think it's ridiculous that someone thinks it a good idea to do this on the first day on the new job. And it's not even the job, just yet.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)What is wrong with meeting with protestors? Please don't compare her to Trump. Unless she is proposing kids in cages the analogy doesn't fit.
ProfessorGAC
(64,877 posts)Reread what i wrote.
Autumn
(44,986 posts)Wintryjade
(814 posts)Wintryjade
(814 posts)Just a new "us" is saying it. I do not get why or who made this a divisive moment in the Democratic Party. Now, I do not know if more was said. But what I hear here, is exactly what our Democratic Leadership and party have, and are saying repeatedly> She merely supported the Democratic position.
What am I missing here, and who made this a battle between the Democrats?
We need to start calling this garbage out, immediately.
(Unless I messed something.).