Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1805 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox judge sides with Schiff over Trump on Mueller report (Original Post)
Quixote1818
Mar 2019
OP
tblue37
(65,499 posts)1. K&R and thanks. nt
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)2. If tRump was innocent we would have seen the full report by now...
Release the full unredacted report to Congress now as past reports have been released.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)3. Every MAGAt would be bragging on FB that they had a copy
It doesn't clear him.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)4. They're not going to call a Special Counsel in to look at
conspiracy/collusion if there was no evidence of it in the first place.
The Trump Russia Timeline
https://www.newsandguts.com/trump-russia/
Plenty evidence of "collusion" was known and had occurred up to Comey's firing in May 2017 to justify a Special Counsel looking into it.