Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

McKim

(2,412 posts)
1. The Child Concentration Camps: The Last Straw for Impeachment
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 02:03 PM
Jul 2019

For this retire ESL Bilingual and Migrant Teacher, the Child Concentration Camps are the last straw in the pile leading to impeachment. Democrats must stand up against Nazi like behavior by starting impeachment proceedings.

chowder66

(9,055 posts)
3. Please read this article
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 02:55 PM
Jul 2019

snip

Pelosi’s sensitivity to public sentiment requires her to keep tabs on three fronts.

The first is the Democratic caucus. She constantly monitors and measures the mood of her colleagues. She rotates through her office the House Democratic leadership, a wider leadership group called the Steering and Policy Committee, the chairs of various legislative committees, and the leaders and members of dozens of disparate caucuses (the Congressional Black Caucus and the conservative Blue Dogs, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the moderate New Democratic Caucus). Then she goes to ground, conferring with members one-on-one. Not everyone knows what everyone else is thinking. She and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer do. It’s how they shape consensus.

snip


But “this moment in time” does not mean “all moments in time.” Pelosi, remember, believes it’s possible to shape public sentiment. That’s why she’s unleashed her committee chairs to fully exercise their oversight responsibilities by investigating every facet of potentially impeachable offenses: Jerry Nadler of the Judiciary Committee, Adam Schiff on Intel, Maxine Waters on Financial Services, Elijah Cummings on Oversight and Reform. They may find a smoking gun—incontrovertible evidence that crystallizes public support for impeachment and maximizes pressure on House Republican incumbents in moderate districts. Then Pelosi will have achieved her goal: a broader public consensus for impeachment and stronger, if not necessarily overwhelming, bipartisan support.

Progressives worry that if Democrats avoid impeachment with this president, they will set a bad precedent. Just how bad must things get? Fair enough. But for Democrats there’s a worse outcome: a premature impeachment that acquits and helps result in the reelection of Trump with a loyal Republican majority in Congress, an expanded Republican majority in state legislatures, and a permanently hyper-conservative judiciary.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/06/nancy-pelosi-public-opinion-and-timing-matter/591385/

George II

(67,782 posts)
5. Why does "TYT" insist on bashing Democrats? If it wasn't Pelosi, it would be Schumer....
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 03:48 PM
Jul 2019

...and in years past it was Clinton, Obama, etc.

I guess when an organization is headed by someone who was an advocate of the Reagan and GHW Bush administrations, pro-life, thought Clarence Thomas was treated unjustly, denied the Armenian genocide, and wasn't a "Democrat" until a few years ago that is to be expected.

BTW, "The Young Turks" was named after the group who perpetrated the Armenian genocide, which says quite a lot about Cenk Uygur.

BTW2, "The Young Turks" is financed by Russia Today and right winger Buddy Roehmer, so don't expect much positive toward Democrats coming from them.

I wonder when they'll be considered "right wing talking points"?

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
8. Today, yesterday, every day!!
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 05:44 PM
Jul 2019
I wonder when they'll be considered "right wing talking points"?
Today, yesterday, every day!! That's all they do.

Totally worthless. Beneath contempt.

George II

(67,782 posts)
11. They didn't, which is why The Young Turks perpetrated the Armenian Genocide.
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 05:55 PM
Jul 2019
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/armenian-genocide

In 1908, a new government came to power in Turkey. A group of reformers who called themselves the “Young Turks” overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid and established a more modern constitutional government.

At first, the Armenians were hopeful that they would have an equal place in this new state, but they soon learned that what the nationalistic Young Turks wanted most of all was to “Turkify” the empire. According to this way of thinking, non-Turks – and especially Christian non-Turks – were a grave threat to the new state.

On April 24, 1915, the Armenian genocide began. That day, the Turkish government arrested and executed several hundred Armenian intellectuals.

After that, ordinary Armenians were turned out of their homes and sent on death marches through the Mesopotamian desert without food or water.

Frequently, the marchers were stripped naked and forced to walk under the scorching sun until they dropped dead. People who stopped to rest were shot.

At the same time, the Young Turks created a “Special Organization,” which in turn organized “killing squads” or “butcher battalions” to carry out, as one officer put it, “the liquidation of the Christian elements.”

These killing squads were often made up of murderers and other ex-convicts. They drowned people in rivers, threw them off cliffs, crucified them and burned them alive. In short order, the Turkish countryside was littered with Armenian corpses.

Records show that during this “Turkification” campaign, government squads also kidnapped children, converted them to Islam and gave them to Turkish families. In some places, they raped women and forced them to join Turkish “harems” or serve as slaves. Muslim families moved into the homes of deported Armenians and seized their property.

Though reports vary, most sources agree that there were about 2 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire at the time of the massacre. In 1922, when the genocide was over, there were just 388,000 Armenians remaining in the Ottoman Empire.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
15. Why the Cenk, and Ana called their group the TYT? The Young Turks?
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 07:07 PM
Jul 2019

From what you are saying, that is the wrong name to take for a team of people who want to defend democracy. Interesting.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
14. Here is the Muller report summarized in 20 minutes by PBS - Watch it, then pass it around
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 07:03 PM
Jul 2019

[link:

|

And every time I read the most absurd opinion I cringe, that of:
"The department concluded that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting president would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions."

Well, if the president is a crook, a criminal, the likelihood that he has aligned himself with people like him are great, so I DO want to undermine, I actually want to stop the executive branch from performing anything. Why would I want a crook to continue serving as president? who in the right mind would like that?

I would like to have someone attempt to pass a law that protects in the same way presidents of corporations, I would love to see their reaction to that.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why does Pelosi keep play...