Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumelleng
(130,895 posts)I should have said 'wait for the assaults.' Didn't take long.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)Suddenly [...] Roosevelt is alive again in the 2020 Democratic primary campaign: His ideas for using government to improve lives echo through stump speeches across Iowa and New Hampshire.
But theres a right way and a wrong way to revive Roosevelt. Before we allow anyone to assume his mantle, lets separate candidates merely seeking inspiration for big ideas from those misappropriating his legacy.
Bernie Sanders, the most explicit of the Roosevelt wannabes, is in the latter category. He has repurposed the Second Bill of Rights address on his website to report that Roosevelt was constantly attacked as a socialist, so he must have actually been one just like the independent senator from Vermont. Hes betting that a younger post-Cold War generation wont conflate his brand of democratic socialism with communism, as many of their elders wrongly do.
But Roosevelt was an improvisational pragmatist a juggler, he called himself not a socialist. While his idea for Social Security contained socialistic elements (as did George W. Bushs 2008 bank bailout), he understood that in a nation of strivers, the concept is a political loser.
When asked his political philosophy, he replied: Im a Christian and a Democrat, thats all.
snip====================================================================
But when Mr. Sanders quotes that line in his stump speech, he doesnt mention that Roosevelt soon tacked to the center. He rebuffed calls for national health insurance as impractical, backed a balanced budget, insisted that most welfare be connected to work and supported free trade.
As World War II approached, he abandoned the New Deal entirely and invited the corporate titans who loathed him to help him win it. With the end of the war in sight, he renewed his liberal domestic agenda with the landmark G.I. Bill, which inspired todays Democratic focus on affordable education.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/21/opinion/fdr-democrats-2020.html
Fiendish Thingy
(15,605 posts)Do I really need the sarcasm thingy?
rwsanders
(2,598 posts)Nearly had to block one only a couple of days ago because he wanted to insist that the "socialism" label would make Bernie "unelectable".
Lots of folks who bought their crystal balls at Spencer Gifts floating around.
Layzeebeaver
(1,623 posts)...that made me spit up a bit of my fortified adult Sunday breakfast drink - well done!
rwsanders
(2,598 posts)Somewhere in the past I realized that even Keith Olbermann (as much as I love him) spends too much of his time prognosticating.
Maybe I should never have clued in, now it is beyond tiresome.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Progressive2020
(713 posts)Whether one is called "socialist", "democratic socialist", whatever, is beside the point of what one actually stands for. I will vote for whatever candidate will fight for FDR's Second Bill of Rights here in the 21st Century. I don't care about the labels; I care about the policies and the commitment to getting them done. I will support any Democrat that will fight for these policies.