Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Day 42 Coronavirus vs SARS/Ebola/Swine Flu Grimacing face....-Active graph (Original Post) riversedge Feb 2020 OP
Scariest graph ever. dewsgirl Feb 2020 #1
Because it is deceptively edited bullshit jberryhill Feb 2020 #3
For DHS head, Kathryn Sibelius, said this one shows 20X's the virulence over our usual flu viruses ancianita Feb 2020 #5
I've seen that graph a couple times on Twitter thanks, I hadn't dewsgirl Feb 2020 #7
On Edit: Apparently, while mostly accurate, the graphic has been edited to WePurrsevere Feb 2020 #2
And that is how deceptive information spreads like a virus jberryhill Feb 2020 #4
Thank you. I had checked but didn't see this. WePurrsevere Feb 2020 #6
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. Because it is deceptively edited bullshit
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 05:21 PM
Feb 2020

Watch the WHOLE THING and decide if you've been lied to.



Jump to 1:36 of the ACTUAL video, and keep watching.

https://www.wthr.com/article/verify-viral-coronavirus-vs-sarsebolaswine-flu-graph-accurate-leaves-out-context

But the 40-second clip on twitter is missing important context.

We tracked down the original source of the clip to a 10-minute youtube video.

If you play beyond the 40 seconds from the viral clip, you’ll see that as you get into the hundreds of days on the chart, swine flu takes over and eventually reaches up to 60 million infected.



WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
2. On Edit: Apparently, while mostly accurate, the graphic has been edited to
Thu Feb 27, 2020, 01:56 PM
Feb 2020

Last edited Fri Feb 28, 2020, 05:51 PM - Edit history (1)

downplay how really bad the swine flu was compared to this Coronavirus at this time. Please read the link provided by jberryhill below for more info.





WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
6. Thank you. I had checked but didn't see this.
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 05:32 PM
Feb 2020

I'm going to delete my retweet from Twitter because it's misleading (not truly incorrect per the article you posted) to have edited it out the rest of the Swine Flu info.

WHAT WE FOUND

The numbers in the video are accurate for the date it was posted. At the time the video was posted, the new Coronavirus had infected more than 43,000 people worldwide. The latest WHO estimate is closer to 82,000.

The charts accurately reflect the data from the CDC and WHO on the infection rates of the coronavirus, SARS, MERS, Ebola and H1N1 (swine flu).

What does that mean? The current coronavirus is infecting more people at a faster rate than any of those other viruses had at this point in those outbreaks.

But the 40-second clip on twitter is missing important context.

We tracked down the original source of the clip to a 10-minute youtube video.

If you play beyond the 40 seconds from the viral clip, you’ll see that as you get into the hundreds of days on the chart, swine flu takes over and eventually reaches up to 60 million infected.

The original video was actually trying to show that coronavirus isn’t the worst - at least not yet.

Bottom line: We can VERIFY this video is true and that the numbers are accurate and come from reputable sources.

But the video doesn’t show the whole story and THAT context is key.


I don't know why people do that. This virus has the potential to be bad enough without misleading about something that was much worse. It's not a contest.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Day 42 Coronavirus vs S...