Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumTooning Out The News: Superhero wants Obamagate crime specifics
This superhero wants to solve the Obamagate crime, but President Trump is unclear about what the crime actually is.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1180 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tooning Out The News: Superhero wants Obamagate crime specifics (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
May 2020
OP
Good point! Considering Trump's blatant misogyny, a female superhero would have been more effective!
Rhiannon12866
May 2020
#2
yuiyoshida
(41,829 posts)1. I am sure she agrees with you...
Rhiannon12866
(205,074 posts)2. Good point! Considering Trump's blatant misogyny, a female superhero would have been more effective!
Aussie105
(5,366 posts)3. How devious!
Trump knows crimes were committed by #44.
But the perpetrator was so devious, Trump can't spell out the actual crimes.
Now, only a massively major criminal intellect could do that. Commit crimes without revealing what they are.
With Trump, the crimes are blatantly obvious. Perhaps Trump is jealous?
Mr Trump, Sir. May I point out the obvious?
You'd like there to be crimes committed that you can call Obamagate.
You suspect crimes were committed.
But suspicion without clear definition of any such crimes, or proof, is just hot air on your part.
But yeah, hot air, something you have plenty of. Could you check the use-by date on your brain please? I think it has gone off.
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)4. LOL