Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1613 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hannity Recommends Tear Gas Gun in Live TV (Original Post)
rsacamano
Jun 2020
OP
If it's so harmless, Hannity should agree to be shot in the face with this device on his show.
sop
Jun 2020
#2
Hannity should ask the family of Victoria Snelgrove how "harmless" they are...
FailureToCommunicate
Jun 2020
#6
No doubt it provides for ease of application by those with little training and even less judgement.
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2020
#4
riversedge
(70,174 posts)1. Dangerous talk like that from Hannity should serve as a firing for him IMHO
But I know his supporters love it.
sop
(10,136 posts)2. If it's so harmless, Hannity should agree to be shot in the face with this device on his show.
Just like he agreed to be waterboarded live on camera, to prove how benign a torture method that was. Hannity chickened out on that "enhanced interrogation" demonstration back then, he'll punk out again.
Paladin
(28,246 posts)5. The waterboarding was the first thing I thought of.
Typical big-mouth chickenshit stuff from trump's favorite jerkoff assistant.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,011 posts)6. Hannity should ask the family of Victoria Snelgrove how "harmless" they are...
underpants
(182,717 posts)3. Why would one need laser targeting for a tear gas gun?
Its an area weapon.
Ford_Prefect
(7,875 posts)4. No doubt it provides for ease of application by those with little training and even less judgement.
packman
(16,296 posts)7. Hey man, IT'S A LASER!!!
also offered in black, tact-light in handle, Punisher Skull embossed, and secret decoding ring. You know, all the things a red-neck warrior needs to fight off those evil liberals.
sop
(10,136 posts)8. A frickin laser beam.
underpants
(182,717 posts)9. Shiny!
If you havent read this article yet please consider setting aside some time.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213572647
magicguido
(6,315 posts)10. When will he volunteer for a test; just to see if its really "harmless"?
Initech
(100,054 posts)11. Still not as effective as a shark with a frickin' laser beam attached to their heads.