Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Pharaoh

(8,209 posts)
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 09:32 AM Sep 2012

The Neocons and 9/11

Let us not forget...............




Robert Perry: The emerging history of 9/11 reveals that President George W. Bush's failure to protect the nation resulted from neocon insistence that Iraq was the real threat, not al-Qaeda. The political relevance today is that the neocons want back into power under a Mitt Romney presidency
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Neocons and 9/11 (Original Post) Pharaoh Sep 2012 OP
Paul Jay is right about the intent. freedom fighter jh Sep 2012 #1
yes, I agree--- the official 9/11 story stinks to high heaven and shame on Parry for not NoMoreWarNow Sep 2012 #3
I recall AT THE TIME dreampunk Sep 2012 #2
? Uneeque Sep 2012 #4

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
1. Paul Jay is right about the intent.
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 10:12 AM
Sep 2012

Robert Parry doesn't see any evidence that the Bush administration's failure to see 911 coming was caused by anything other than their insistence on focusing on Iraq.

Paul Jay raises the possibility that the Bush administration may have missed 911 deliberately, to get their "new Pearl Harbor."

There is evidence that the failure was deliberate in the administration response once 911 did happen. Secretary of State Colin Powell promised the public a report about Osama bin Laden but never delivered. Asked for a 911 investigation, Bush stalled for over a year and when Congress finally did investigate, he withheld a great deal of information. Bush and Cheney refused to testify to the commission separately; they needed each other there to make sure they got their story straight. Later, the NIST investigation of how the towers collapsed carefully avoided any real investigation of, well, how the towers collapsed -- it stopped looking at the point where the collapses began, the NIST team refused to look into the obvious possibility of explosives, and NIST engineer John Gross refused to acknowledge reports of molten steel at Ground Zero.

I think Parry misses it because he's looking only (at least as far as this interview goes) at what happened *before* 911. From that point of view, obsessive focus on Iraq in response to Neocon pressure could look pretty much the same as a deliberate refusal to see 911 coming.

 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
3. yes, I agree--- the official 9/11 story stinks to high heaven and shame on Parry for not
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 09:47 AM
Sep 2012

even being willing to admit that Bushco engaged in "LIHOP". Parry has always been this way, refusing to see any hint of conspiracy, and more or less participating in the 9/11 coverup, along with the rest of the mainstream media.

dreampunk

(88 posts)
2. I recall AT THE TIME
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 11:44 AM
Sep 2012

there were many reports out of the pentagon and cia of the Cheney neocon crew stuffing unqualified personnel into positions of importance. BEFORE 9-11 even. At that exact time it did not make a lot of sense. It didn't take long to see the connection of the 9-11 disasters to the senseless invasion of Iraq.

Why do so many hate America? Let me count the ways.

Remember Hillary Clinton's attempt to warn of the great right wing conspiracy? Too bad it was impolitical to listen to her at the time, eh?

 

Uneeque

(8 posts)
4. ?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:43 PM
Sep 2012

The neocons cannot get back in because they never left. Remove the decorations and calendars and it would be impossible to distinguish 2012 from 2006.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»The Neocons and 9/11