Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ItsjustMe

(11,971 posts)
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 10:15 AM Oct 2020

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (ItsjustMe) on Wed Jul 21, 2021, 05:53 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) ItsjustMe Oct 2020 OP
I've been looking for this. Cracklin Charlie Oct 2020 #1
Deliberate amnesia bucolic_frolic Oct 2020 #2
Welcome to the future America. Get ready to board the waybackmachine. NoMoreRepugs Oct 2020 #3
Definitely unqualified to be a SCOTUS justice. IllinoisBirdWatcher Oct 2020 #4
Preeminent Brain Surgeon can't name four lobes of brain StClone Oct 2020 #5
Yep, omitting from frontal recollection the right to redress and peacefully assemble....... jaxexpat Oct 2020 #6
Great description. Duppers Oct 2020 #9
Follow up- she basically said "Like, I wasn't briefed on that question" underpants Oct 2020 #7
"And like, how do they benefit Our Dear Leader Trump!?" sandensea Oct 2020 #8

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
1. I've been looking for this.
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 10:17 AM
Oct 2020

Thank you!

bucolic_frolic

(55,180 posts)
2. Deliberate amnesia
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 10:29 AM
Oct 2020

Cons want to pretend 1A doesn't exist. It helps their messaging.

NoMoreRepugs

(12,088 posts)
3. Welcome to the future America. Get ready to board the waybackmachine.
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 10:38 AM
Oct 2020

IllinoisBirdWatcher

(2,316 posts)
4. Definitely unqualified to be a SCOTUS justice.
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 11:12 AM
Oct 2020

She has disqualified herself with her lack of knowledge and/or lack of candor.

StClone

(11,869 posts)
5. Preeminent Brain Surgeon can't name four lobes of brain
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 11:32 AM
Oct 2020

Great Ornithologist can't name five species of owls
Jacques Cousteau can't name seven seas
George Carlin forgets the seven words you can't say on TV
World Great Mountain Climber doesn't remember seven great mountain ranges
Mark Twain can not recall the things he promises!
(These I Can Promise by Mark Twain:
I cannot promise you a life of sunshine;
I cannot promise riches, wealth, or gold;
I cannot promise you an easy pathway
That leads away from change or growing old.
But I can promise all my heart's devotion;
A smile to chase away your tears of sorrow;
A love that's ever true and ever growing;
A hand to hold in yours through each tomorrow.)

 

jaxexpat

(7,794 posts)
6. Yep, omitting from frontal recollection the right to redress and peacefully assemble.......
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 12:16 PM
Oct 2020

IS VERY TELLING INDEED.
This woman is an authoritarian! A soulless monster. She has no respect for nor comprehension of any social strategy which may differ from the narrow and sterile "teachings" grafted onto her by parochial schooling since pre-kindergarten. And the most narrow and oppressive versions wielded by that propagandarequ colossus are, for her, the primary and preferred decision-making cruces. She is a product of traditional educational formulae requiring hypnosis at age 4, followed by lobotomization upon secondary graduation.
Placing her on the SC bench with her quiver of basic rational conceptualization? What could go wrong? She'd probably be only a fraction more harmful than Scalia.

2nd patent applied for new word of today, "propagandarequ", def 1: requiring absolute and total belief in all aspects of an unproveable concept in order to accept any parts, def 2: blind faith in the positive aspects of child molestation, def 3: the state of being stuporific >50% of the time, def 4: argumentative S. American rodent

Duppers

(28,469 posts)
9. Great description.
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 01:51 PM
Oct 2020

I think you nailed her personality and conditional thinking perfectly.

(Grew up with a woman like her.)

underpants

(196,539 posts)
7. Follow up- she basically said "Like, I wasn't briefed on that question"
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 12:18 PM
Oct 2020

sandensea

(23,362 posts)
8. "And like, how do they benefit Our Dear Leader Trump!?"
Thu Oct 15, 2020, 01:45 PM
Oct 2020

"Because if they don't, we - like - don't need them. Doh!"

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»This message was self-del...