Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumIdaho lawmaker cites 'To Kill A Mockingbird' as proof of critical race theory in schools
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1904 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Idaho lawmaker cites 'To Kill A Mockingbird' as proof of critical race theory in schools (Original Post)
turbinetree
Apr 2021
OP
Jim__
(14,075 posts)1. An essay that talks about Critical Race Theory: The Unchosen Condition
This essay is in the Spring 2021 issue of The Hedgehog Review. It's really more of a criticism of Robin Diangelo's White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. The criticism of this book says that its somewhat radical allegations are connected to Critical Race Theory (CRT) and then, unfairly, serve as the basis for criticisms of CRT. I haven't read White Fragility and so I can't comment as to the accuracy of the criticisms in the essay.
An excerpt from the essay:
An excerpt from the essay:
Is there really anything left to say about White Fragility? If Infinite Jest is a symbol of pretentious masculinity and On the Road a totem of the Beat generation, Robin DiAngelos slim volume is a metaphor for the state of racial progressivism in America circa 2020. To let it lie casually on a desk or coffee table is to signal a commitment to societal change, to dismantling systemic racism, to doing the work. To demand that someone read it is simply to point out that benighted souls theoretical unsophistication on racial matters. (If you dont understand why its offensive for a white man to bounce a black child on his knee while joking about integration, you need to read White Fragility.1) On the other hand, mentioning Robin DiAngelo with a roll of the eyes signifies dissatisfaction with identity politics, wokeness, or perhaps the mingling of corporate power and ersatz radicalism that certain socialists of an older generation see in the New New Left. Critical reviews of White Fragility by liberal centrists (Matt Taibbi, Jonathan Chait, John McWhorter, Conor Friedersdorf) have become vehicles for broader complaints about the state of progressive cultural politics.
Many commentators have assimilated White Fragility into critical race theory (CRT), a term that is now applied to a vast, heterogenous body of work in law, political science, sociology, history, literature, education, journalism, and business management. The first critical race theorists were legal academics concerned with identifying inadequacies in antidiscrimination law and affirmative action programs. They distinguished themselves from conventional law professors by their willingness to critique the foundations of the liberal order, and by a crucial set of premises: that racism, past and present, remains a powerful influence on American life, and that justice requires ongoing, race-targeted policy interventions. But those premises had obvious applications beyond legal academia, and subsequent contributions in other fields have applied them to innumerable spheres of policy, politics, and culture. To its critics, CRT is unhealthily obsessed with race, imagining insidious forms of discrimination at every turn. To its defenders, however, CRT forces a necessary reckoning with difficult and sometimes hidden truths.2
DiAngelos primary employment is in diversity training, a field that extends some of CRTs analytical principles into the corporate world. Companies and other private organizations, seemingly moved by some combination of genuine social concern and the desire to avoid liability,3 pay diversity trainers to deliver bracing speeches about systemic racism to their employees. According to her website, DiAngelo has given presentations to companies such as Amazon and Unilever4; her average fee in 2020 was $14,000 for a ninety-minute session. Diversity trainers work tends to be less measured than academic CRTperhaps because it isnt subject to peer review, perhaps because corporate clients want something impressive and shocking in return for those five-figure fees. For example, the now notorious Smithsonian Chart, on which it was declared in July 2020 that objective, rational, linear thinking and plan for future [sic] are aspects and assumptions of white culture in the United States, was the work of DiAngelos colleague Judith Katz,5 who leads transformational change initiatives for corporate clients like Allstate Insurance, United Airlines, and Merck Pharmaceuticals.6
It is not altogether surprising, then, that White Fragility is hardly the best of CRT. But its curious mingling of racial apocalypticism and social-scientific value neutrality, served up in the language of organizational management, is in many ways characteristic of our moment. Beyond DiAngelos strange and fractured picture of the world, a more sober and moderate CRT offers a vital corrective to the flaws of colorblind liberal politics while holding onto liberalisms noblest aspirations. For that reason, appreciating the true strangeness of White Fragility can help us to distinguish that significant and urgent body of work from the excesses that DiAngelos work representsexcesses that too easily lend themselves to the caricatures drawn by CRTs most hostile critics.
...
Many commentators have assimilated White Fragility into critical race theory (CRT), a term that is now applied to a vast, heterogenous body of work in law, political science, sociology, history, literature, education, journalism, and business management. The first critical race theorists were legal academics concerned with identifying inadequacies in antidiscrimination law and affirmative action programs. They distinguished themselves from conventional law professors by their willingness to critique the foundations of the liberal order, and by a crucial set of premises: that racism, past and present, remains a powerful influence on American life, and that justice requires ongoing, race-targeted policy interventions. But those premises had obvious applications beyond legal academia, and subsequent contributions in other fields have applied them to innumerable spheres of policy, politics, and culture. To its critics, CRT is unhealthily obsessed with race, imagining insidious forms of discrimination at every turn. To its defenders, however, CRT forces a necessary reckoning with difficult and sometimes hidden truths.2
DiAngelos primary employment is in diversity training, a field that extends some of CRTs analytical principles into the corporate world. Companies and other private organizations, seemingly moved by some combination of genuine social concern and the desire to avoid liability,3 pay diversity trainers to deliver bracing speeches about systemic racism to their employees. According to her website, DiAngelo has given presentations to companies such as Amazon and Unilever4; her average fee in 2020 was $14,000 for a ninety-minute session. Diversity trainers work tends to be less measured than academic CRTperhaps because it isnt subject to peer review, perhaps because corporate clients want something impressive and shocking in return for those five-figure fees. For example, the now notorious Smithsonian Chart, on which it was declared in July 2020 that objective, rational, linear thinking and plan for future [sic] are aspects and assumptions of white culture in the United States, was the work of DiAngelos colleague Judith Katz,5 who leads transformational change initiatives for corporate clients like Allstate Insurance, United Airlines, and Merck Pharmaceuticals.6
It is not altogether surprising, then, that White Fragility is hardly the best of CRT. But its curious mingling of racial apocalypticism and social-scientific value neutrality, served up in the language of organizational management, is in many ways characteristic of our moment. Beyond DiAngelos strange and fractured picture of the world, a more sober and moderate CRT offers a vital corrective to the flaws of colorblind liberal politics while holding onto liberalisms noblest aspirations. For that reason, appreciating the true strangeness of White Fragility can help us to distinguish that significant and urgent body of work from the excesses that DiAngelos work representsexcesses that too easily lend themselves to the caricatures drawn by CRTs most hostile critics.
...
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)3. Thank you...
yonder
(9,663 posts)2. Rep. Heather Scott, aka codename "Greenbean" in the Coalition of Western States,
a far-right states advocacy group. She is among the kookiest of the kooks in the Pacific Northwest.
https://sandpointreader.com/rep-heather-scott-features-in-wa-house-investigation-into-matt-sheas-domestic-terrorism/
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)4. "To kill a mockingbird" was published 1960