Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumDonald Trump Breathes New Life Into Need for an Investigation into Justice Brett Kavanaugh
TheBlackAdder
(28,179 posts)Warpy
(111,220 posts)because that's what Republican males think women are for.
Going after the convenient disappearance of large amonts of debt--twice--should have been the focus all along.
These 3 injustices were all Mercer picks. Whether or not those two are the ones who made his debts (reportedly from gambling) vanish, is anyone's tuess. Kavanaughs finances should have been examined very closely. Instead, he pretty much skipped the vetting process while the Democrats got bogged down in what a vicious prick he was in his 20s.
He's the most vulnerable of the 3 rotten picks McConnell rammed through.
poli-junkie
(1,002 posts)At Kavanaugh hearing the emphasis was on Dr. Fords testimony, when it should have been Senator Patrick Leahys questioning Kavanaugh about his finances. The spotlight was on Dr. Ford, but then Sen. Graham chimed in with his faux outrage about Dems denegrating the character of Kavanaugh, and, poof, Dr. Fords testimony evaporated. The he said/she said testimonies dont work when it comes to Supreme Court nominees.
Dems were hot on the trail when it came to Kavanaughs finances they should have led with that. Not to mention the whole Justice Kennedy surprise retiring from the bench to install his law clerk Kavanaugh, in exchange for favors given by Kennedys son, Anthony, who worked for Deutche Bank, and gave loans to Trump, when no bank would.
Problem was, Dems had an elderly Leahy do the financial questioning to Kavanaugh. Leahys delivery was hard to hear and understand, and so this opportunity was lost.
Warpy
(111,220 posts)and I wanted to march in there and bang their heads together while screaming "Stop thinking with your dicks!"
They had a perfect chance to torpedo that asshole's nomination and they blew it. They also did a disservice to Dr. Ford, opening her life up and making her vulnerable to attack from every Chump and crazoid out there.
wnylib
(21,410 posts)found to have lied in his confirmation hearings, or to have committed past crimes, isn't there a statute of limitations regarding charges? Is it possible to remove a SC Justice?
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,820 posts)Glenn seems to suggest there isn't.
wnylib
(21,410 posts)to prevent an investigation.
Most crimes have a statute of limitations, except murder, which has none.
So Kavanaugh can be investigated, but I wonder if he can be charged.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,820 posts)While he may not get prosecuted for his crimes they still could theoretically be used to impeach and remove him from the court.
wnylib
(21,410 posts)that it will happen.
Blue Owl
(50,325 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,046 posts)poli-junkie
(1,002 posts)ShazamIam
(2,570 posts)banker at Deutsche Bank.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/the-son-of-former-supreme-court-justice-anthony-kennedy-helped-trump-secure-loans-at-deutsche-bank/
Though certainly the debt issue was never investigated, at least not publicly reported as such.