Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumPic Of The Moment: Only On Fox News

This dude literally said it's not the government's job to protect people
Follow @demunderground

YoshidaYui
(45,090 posts)Hes always been an idiot. Fox news just loves idiots. They put them on TV every day.
underpants
(195,550 posts)and stuck around.
JohnnyRingo
(20,630 posts)...and I'm not sure which of them benefit.
llashram
(6,269 posts)devoid of intelligence. True 'dead head'. Not meant to insult the fans of the Grateful Dead.
dickthegrouch
(4,392 posts)Giving everyone social security? What commies!
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Protect the elite and wealthy from taxation.
Augiedog
(2,696 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,599 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,544 posts)elsewhere.
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,544 posts)Or the South Sandwich Islands?
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Pancreatic cancer or leprosy. And this real cool vacation could be his.
Pepsidog
(6,355 posts)czarjak
(13,512 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(133,902 posts)NewHendoLib
(61,696 posts)Kablooie
(19,075 posts)All the little people must learn to deal with life on their own.
(while paying to protect the super wealthy who don't pay themselves.)
Natch!
ShazzieB
(22,333 posts)"The government's job is to protect everybody -- their safety, and their welfare, as well as their liberty. It says so right there in the Constitution..."
And it's not just in the Constitution. It's right at the beginning. In the gosh dang PREAMBLE, which is the part everyone who's read any of it has read.
What a maroon!
underpants
(195,550 posts)Quickly. Nothing going on up in his head. Like a BB in a beer can.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,683 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(11,872 posts)calimary
(89,289 posts)3825-87867
(1,831 posts)
Grokenstein
(6,297 posts)Is it to make the already-wealthy more wealthy? Control women's bodies? Keep "those people" in line?
Tell us, Brian.
(Quick reminder: Douchey and Killme are the "he was no angel" guys. They made researching the lives of murder victims* to find any excuse to "justify" their murders the thing it is today.)
*well, a certain sort of murder victims...
orleans
(36,732 posts)aggiesal
(10,638 posts)Any government that fails to do so is a government unworthy to lead.
1st - Maybe Brian Kilmeade should read this paragraph, and tell Pendejo45, that he was wrong about governments duty.
2nd - I kept posting this paragraph during the campaign hoping Biden would use it, but I never heard him say this.
I thought this was a perfect sound bite against Pendejo45, using his own words, based on the lack of defending lives against Covid.
IronLionZion
(50,994 posts)I want my taxes back!
twodogsbarking
(17,924 posts)IronLionZion
(50,994 posts)oh wait...
ladym55
(2,577 posts)And that is difficult for our man Brian. Look at ALL those syllables ... tranquility, posterity ... and the complicated sentences. Brian is still working through the easy reader series, which is why he was shook about Dr. Seuss. He hasn't finished Hop on Pop yet.
soldierant
(9,304 posts)because the actual word "protect" is not used... only "form," "establish," "insure," "provide for," "promote," and "secure." What? A sin-oh-nim is some kind pf spice and a thesaurus is a dinosaur, which everyone knows are extinct.
dianaredwing
(406 posts)Is to continually raise money and run for office. They are not supposed to DO anything productive. Heaven forbid.
Demobrat
(10,270 posts)If its not the governments job to protect people, why do we have a military?
Uncle Joe
(64,539 posts)Thanks for the thread Earl.
BigmanPigman
(54,794 posts)that photo I see a resemblance with both Beavis and Butthead.
Snackshack
(2,576 posts)That I saw a post about a school board voting to end teaching Civics or anything about slavery in their school district today.
That falls right in line with this fox idiot who for years now has just said one dumb thing after another.
Chinama
(5 posts)Cigarettes and Alcohol would be illegal if this were the case that they have to protect everybody, among many other unhealthy things government allows.
BumRushDaShow
(167,110 posts)Amendment XXI
Section 1.
The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
Section 2.
The transportation or importation into any state, territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.
Section 3.
This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several states, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the states by the Congress.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxxi
Supreme Court rules that FDA cannot regulate tobacco industry
