Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

DinahMoeHum

(21,766 posts) Tue Sep 21, 2021, 11:01 PM Sep 2021

Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell share a laugh. . .

. . .over Trump's "lawsuit" against the NY Times and his niece Mary. . .

&t=299s

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell share a laugh. . . (Original Post) DinahMoeHum Sep 2021 OP

This lawsuit is filed by a four attorney firm from New Jersey LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2021 #1

Dewey, Cheatam, and Howe? Oh wait, that is only a three-person firm. niyad Sep 2021 #2

Here is a link to the lawsuit LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2021 #3

LetMyPeopleVote

(144,842 posts)

1. This lawsuit is filed by a four attorney firm from New Jersey

Reply to DinahMoeHum (Original post)

Tue Sep 21, 2021, 11:15 PM

Sep 2021

I wonder if this is a contingent fee case?

niyad

(112,974 posts)

2. Dewey, Cheatam, and Howe? Oh wait, that is only a three-person firm.

Reply to LetMyPeopleVote (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 21, 2021, 11:30 PM

Sep 2021

LetMyPeopleVote

(144,842 posts)

3. Here is a link to the lawsuit

Reply to DinahMoeHum (Original post)

Tue Sep 21, 2021, 11:30 PM

Sep 2021

It is filed by a 4 attorney firm from New Jersey that does not list any credentials for the attorneys in the firm

Link to tweet

Every firm that I know and all of the big firms list the credentials of the attorneys such as which law schools attended and any honors/publications

I read the petition and I suspect that this is a contingent fee case where TFG is not paying the attorneys. This is a bad contingent fee case in that most of the issues may be resolved in a summary judgement on the enforcablity of NDA

Reply to this discussion