Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Donkees

(31,452 posts) Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:22 AM Jan 2022

LIVE 10:30AM ET: Biden gives remarks on the use of military personnel to handle COVID-19 surge

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LIVE 10:30AM ET: Biden gives remarks on the use of military personnel to handle COVID-19 surge (Original Post) Donkees Jan 2022 OP

Welp... IrishAfricanAmerican Jan 2022 #1

Unlike TFG, Biden is on top of every aspect of this pandemic and working his ass off to keep it.... George II Jan 2022 #2

Jackbooted socialist storm troopers are crushing their freedoms IronLionZion Jan 2022 #3

IrishAfricanAmerican

(3,818 posts)

1. Welp...

Reply to Donkees (Original post)

Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:37 AM

Jan 2022

this along with "Robin Sage" military exercise ought to really set the hair brains on fire.

George II

(67,782 posts)

2. Unlike TFG, Biden is on top of every aspect of this pandemic and working his ass off to keep it....

Reply to Donkees (Original post)

Thu Jan 13, 2022, 12:20 PM

Jan 2022

....under control as best as one can.

Note to Americans and republicans in particular - President Biden will be in office one week from today, he has yet to pick up a golf club or go on an extended vacation.

IronLionZion

(45,523 posts)

3. Jackbooted socialist storm troopers are crushing their freedoms

Reply to Donkees (Original post)

Thu Jan 13, 2022, 12:41 PM

Jan 2022

to hear freepers tell it. We already have socialist empty shelves in grocery stores that totally have nothing to do with snow storms. Snow is just an excuse typical used by socialists. Long lines for COVID tests also prove socialism.

Reply to this discussion