Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 692 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Attacks Civil Rights, Uses 400 Year Old Law As Justification (Original Post)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
May 2022
OP
It doesn't seem to be the NINETEEN-fifties that Republicans want to take us back to after all. n/t
Beartracks
May 2022
#1
I don't think that the commenter at TYT added anything to what Lawrence O'Donnell said.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#4
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)1. It doesn't seem to be the NINETEEN-fifties that Republicans want to take us back to after all. n/t
Rhiannon12866
(206,205 posts)2. They apparently want to burn us as witches...
Christine O'Donnell
Yoyoyo77
(269 posts)3. No, not even the 1850's.
TexasTowelie
(112,490 posts)4. I don't think that the commenter at TYT added anything to what Lawrence O'Donnell said.
His message is also inaccurate. He mentioned that the Democrats have supermajorities in Congress which is obviously not true. When statements that are obviously untrue are made it weakens the rest of the argument.
It's a mixed bag over at TYT. Some of the people provide meaningful analysis, offer additional insight, and have some journalistic experience, while others lack the skills to be vloggers. This is the fourth or fifth time that I've watched this guy. I believe that it will be the last.