Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumDOJ Indicts Navarro & Bannon but not Meadows & Scavino. Here are three possible explanations why.
On the same day we learned that the grand jury had indicted Peter Navarro for contempt of Congress, we also learned that the Department of Justice decided not to pursue indictments of Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, even though they also committed the same crime - contempt of Congress.
Here are the three leading reasons whay the DOJ decided to indict only two of the four individuals who defied congressional subpoenas. - Glenn Kirschner 06/04/2022.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ Indicts Navarro & Bannon but not Meadows & Scavino. Here are three possible explanations why. (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Jun 2022
OP
Yes, there is that introduction, LOL. But he has the background and experience
Rhiannon12866
Jun 2022
#2
Pluvious
(5,307 posts)1. IMO he's nailed it
Thanks for sharing
( to others, you can skip the first and last two minutes if time is precious )
Rhiannon12866
(252,158 posts)2. Yes, there is that introduction, LOL. But he has the background and experience
And I really appreciate his take on these complicated legal issues, not to mention that he usually turns out to be spot on...
Me.
(35,454 posts)3. There's Always A Plan B
until there isn't
