Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumfrom 2018 - Former Australian Prime Minister: Why Not Change The Second Amendment?
(sorry about Chuck Todd)
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
from 2018 - Former Australian Prime Minister: Why Not Change The Second Amendment? (Original Post)
magicguido
Jun 2022
OP
That's exactly the pretext Charles Koch needs to change the whole Constitution. If
ancianita
Jun 2022
#1
ancianita
(43,162 posts)1. That's exactly the pretext Charles Koch needs to change the whole Constitution. If
anyone wants to see what his version would look like, all they need do is examine the Chilean constitution in the days of Pinochet, the one that required all new legislation to pass, and candidates to win, by 60% majority.
Reconstituting democratic constitutions is how autocracies are made. It's the James Buchanan, University of Chicago, Mont Pelerin and now, Republican model for keeping minority white rule.
I have family, grandkids in Australia, love Australia, but this PM dude is truly stupid about the U.S.
malthaussen
(18,477 posts)2. Because we'd never get the State legislatures to sign off on it. n/t
J_William_Ryan
(3,405 posts)3. Constitutional Amendments can't be 'changed,'
they can only be repealed via Constitutional amendment which isnt going to happen with the Second Amendment.
Instead, Amendments are interpreted by the courts, and those interpretations can be changed.