Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(255,525 posts)
Tue Dec 27, 2022, 11:30 PM Dec 2022

Trump White House EXPOSED BURNING DOCUMENTS in BOMBSHELL Deposition Testimony - Meidas Touch



MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on new deposition testimony released by the January 6 Committee showing the potentially criminal handling and destruction of documents by Mark Meadows.


19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump White House EXPOSED BURNING DOCUMENTS in BOMBSHELL Deposition Testimony - Meidas Touch (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 OP
nothing will happen to any of those involved. republianmushroom Dec 2022 #1
Are you psychic? Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #3
23 months and counting republianmushroom Dec 2022 #5
Kind of like Watergate, but bigger. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #6
"Worse Than Watergate" by quite a bit. Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 #7
That's why I said bigger. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #8
You're right, a great deal bigger and infinitely more serious. Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 #9
and they didn't have personal computers, cell phones . How did they do it republianmushroom Dec 2022 #10
They still haven't computerized a grand jury. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #11
Until the grand jury is presented evidence, from the DoJ, republianmushroom Dec 2022 #12
Consider that Garland never leaks. Smith won't either. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #13
On the other foot republianmushroom Dec 2022 #14
So the certainty in your initial post was unwarranted. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #15
no I'm speculating as you are. It is my OPTION. Sorry you don't like it republianmushroom Dec 2022 #16
You're talking out your ass. Sorry you don't like hearing it. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #17
Don't mine that means your reading my posting. thank you republianmushroom Dec 2022 #18
At least it's not a thousand posts that say "I like it." Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #19
friend of mine was chief petty officer , us navy. worked in nsa at dc. if she tried to get AllaN01Bear Dec 2022 #2
That should have happened to TFG. Would anyone have missed him? Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 #4

Rhiannon12866

(255,525 posts)
7. "Worse Than Watergate" by quite a bit.
Wed Dec 28, 2022, 09:46 PM
Dec 2022

Foreign powers were involved among other egregious transgressions.

republianmushroom

(22,326 posts)
10. and they didn't have personal computers, cell phones . How did they do it
Wed Dec 28, 2022, 10:34 PM
Dec 2022

in the length of time they did it in ? And with a republican Attorney General.

republianmushroom

(22,326 posts)
12. Until the grand jury is presented evidence, from the DoJ,
Thu Dec 29, 2022, 01:29 PM
Dec 2022

there can be no indictment. The grand jury must have evidence from the DoJ before it can
determine whether or not there is enough evidence to indict for said crime. Correct.

With out evidence from the DoJ there can not be an indictment. The grand jury doesn't need to be
computerized it just needs the evidence, from the DoJ, to do their job. Maybe the
DoJ needs better computers ?

23 months and counting



Qutzupalotl

(15,824 posts)
13. Consider that Garland never leaks. Smith won't either.
Thu Dec 29, 2022, 06:10 PM
Dec 2022

The fact that you can't see what they're doing does not mean they are doing nothing.

As you said, there is more evidence here than there was in Watergate. That mountain of evidence must still be evaluated by humans. It is reasonable to expect this to take a little longer than Watergate.

republianmushroom

(22,326 posts)
14. On the other foot
Thu Dec 29, 2022, 07:56 PM
Dec 2022

The fact that you can't see if they're doing anything does not mean they are doing something.
23 months and counting

Qutzupalotl

(15,824 posts)
15. So the certainty in your initial post was unwarranted.
Thu Dec 29, 2022, 11:27 PM
Dec 2022

You do not know the outcome, but behaved as though you did. You deserved to be called out.

AllaN01Bear

(29,494 posts)
2. friend of mine was chief petty officer , us navy. worked in nsa at dc. if she tried to get
Wed Dec 28, 2022, 12:32 AM
Dec 2022

docs out of building, doors would close , alarms going off and shed dissapear. i agree nothing happen,

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Trump White House EXPOSED...