Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

czarjak

(13,524 posts)
7. "I'm a member of a secret society, a society so secret, I can't even talk about it"?
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 09:20 PM
Mar 2023

That bullshit still pisses me off.

Warpy

(114,520 posts)
8. Only if Cheney and Curveball are hauled in, as well
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 09:41 PM
Mar 2023

Iraq was more Cheney's idea, he was a signatory to the PNAC fantasy of sending the entire Middle East up in flames so we (figuratievly speaking, you and I would pay through the nose for it) could grab all the oil. Anyone who read their fantasy before it was scrubbed knew what a farce it was from the beginning.

So although Dubya got himself talked into it and belongs in the dock, Cheney and his pet liar belong there with him.

markpkessinger

(8,887 posts)
9. No, he shouldn't be on trial now. He should h ave been put on trial in 2009!
Sun Mar 19, 2023, 01:48 PM
Mar 2023

But he wasn't. Why? Because President Obama wanted to "look forwards, not backward," and because Nancy Pelosi refused to start an investigation of the prior administration's war crimes.

Look, primary responsibility for what happened in Iraq rests with Bush. But there were a number of powerful Democrats who were willing to look the other way at the time. We forget that at our peril.

markpkessinger

(8,887 posts)
10. The failure to hold anyone accocuntable for war crimes in Iraq was a bipartisan one . . .
Sun Mar 19, 2023, 09:13 PM
Mar 2023

Nancy Pelosi, who had made noises throughout 2007 and 2007 about holding Bush and his team accountable, abruptly changed here tune after the 2008 elections, and shut down any discussion of doing so among Congressional Democrats, because she didn't want to "re-litigate the past." . And in 2009, a newly-elected President Obama, when asked about the same subject, said, naively and, I daresay, rather selfishly, that he wanted to "look forward, not backwards."

Responsibility for what happened in Iraq rests squarely with Bush and his administration. But the failure to hold him accountable is a failure owned by botgh parties, sad to say.

Uncle Joe

(64,625 posts)
11. Watch Bush's body language at about the 27:28 mark
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 12:43 AM
Mar 2023

when asked "knowing what you know now about Iraq do you still think it was it a good idea to go in?"

Thanks for the thread peppertree

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»20 years on, should Georg...